Re: Lost on E4 (no spoilers, please)
- From: "Dan Owen" <danowen@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2005 21:52:32 GMT
>>Most of the series so far has included little to do with them trying to
>>get off the island, finding out where they are, or finding out what the
>>monster is or who the other people are (the French woman and the rest).
>
> Yes, their lack of inquisitiveness is a bit annoying.
This is addressed soon.
>>Much of what has been on the show has been really trivial and/or
>>irrelevant to them being on the island.
>
> If you mean the flashbacks, then that's really the purpose of the show -
> to put all the lostaways into context and perhaps evolve a reason why they
> are all there. Have you noticed how some of them appear fleetingly in one
> another's stories? Spotting that is all part of the mystery and a reason
> for watching.
>
>>It seems to be going nowhere. Are the writers making it up as they go
>>along?
They admit they didn't have much of a masterplan for the first half of the
season, but based on season 2 I think there's a very good overall arc
becoming very apparent. Stick with it, season 1 really picks up after the
"mid-way wobble" most US TV series go through.
>>Tonight's episode was about those numbers bringing bad luck - something
>>which seems to be relevant, at last. However, the idea of numbers alone
>>causing bad luck is quite ridiculous. I hope there's going to be a decent
>>explanation for them.
They are very important, keep watching.
Dan
.
- References:
- Lost on E4 (no spoilers, please)
- From: Anthony Haines
- Re: Lost on E4 (no spoilers, please)
- From: Roland Perry
- Lost on E4 (no spoilers, please)
- Prev by Date: Re: *** and Dom slam BBC over quiz
- Next by Date: Re: Nice to see our licence fee being so well spent!
- Previous by thread: Re: Lost on E4 (no spoilers, please)
- Next by thread: Re: Lost on E4 (no spoilers, please)
- Index(es):
Loading