Re: OT - Banning booze on public transport
- From: Silver <silver@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 30 Oct 2005 18:39:47 +0000
On 30 Oct 2005 17:28:18 GMT, Marcus Houlden <spam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
>On Sun, 30 Oct 2005 16:56:59 +0000, Roland Perry <roland@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>wrote the following to uk.media.tv.misc:
>
>> In message <4364DA45.7C84137A@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, at 14:32:21 on
>> Sun, 30 Oct 2005, Johannes <johs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> remarked:
>>>This is part of the 'Respect Agenda'. There are also plans to confiscate
>>>homes of the parents of misbehaving children.
>>
>> Confiscate their homes, so the family has to live in B&B at public
>> expense. They re-offend, so confiscate their B&B. Is it useful that the
>> children are then sleeping rough?
>
>Probably beyond the govt to find out why the kids are misbehaving in the
>first place and deal with *that* instead. Whatever happened to being tough
>on the causes of crime anyway?
Why is it always the governments job? It's the bloody parents fault,
nobody else.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: OT - Banning booze on public transport
- From: Hognoxious
- Re: OT - Banning booze on public transport
- References:
- Re: OT - Banning booze on public transport
- From: Johannes
- Re: OT - Banning booze on public transport
- From: Marcus Houlden
- Re: OT - Banning booze on public transport
- Prev by Date: Re: Barclays advert - What are they selling?
- Next by Date: Nike ad music?
- Previous by thread: Re: OT - Banning booze on public transport
- Next by thread: Re: OT - Banning booze on public transport
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|