Re: Bit Torrent
- From: Krustov <krusty@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 9 Oct 2005 16:48:14 +0100
<uk.media.tv.misc , Mike Redrobe , mike@xxxxxxxxxxx>
<8ga2f.125208$G8.3033@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
<Sun, 09 Oct 2005 15:00:20 GMT>
> The biggest weakness is that the protocol builds files /mostly/ from
> start to end, with the last 10% or so becoming "rarer" on the network,
>
> People share the file (by design) during their whole download,
> but once they reach 100% they often burn to dvd & delete,
> leading to a slowdown (less sources) or even a stop at the later
> stages (noone still online with 100%)
>
> E.g. 5 people with 97% always have the same 97% , where
> a better design might be able to make 100% out of those
> differing 97% portions if the protocol downloaded a random
> position of the file.
>
> bittorrent v2 maybe ?
>
Perhaps break the file into 1 meg chunks .
With the 1 meg chunk being a direct download from a single pc unless the
connection is broken .
Only one person downloading a particular 1 meg chunk at any one time
from that particular pc .
As well as picking the 1 meg chunk at random - the same pc wouldnt be
used twice in a row unless there was no other option .
How does that sound .
--
(c) The Amazing Krustov
.
- References:
- Re: Bit Torrent
- From: Heracles Pollux
- Re: Bit Torrent
- From: Mike Redrobe
- Re: Bit Torrent
- Prev by Date: Re: Green Wing Series 2
- Next by Date: Re: OT - New world disaster. Get your money ready!
- Previous by thread: Re: Bit Torrent
- Next by thread: Re: Bit Torrent
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|