Re: Working Lunch and VOIP
- From: Bruce Stewart <bruce_stewart@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2005 10:34:24 GMT
Dariusz wrote:
> In article <3ojecvF5hc44U1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "tim \(moved to sweden\)"
> <tim_in_sweden2005@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> They do not want you to use the other services, they want you to use
>>> theirs, and they will use whatever political influence they have to f*ck
>>> over the VoIP companies.
>>
>>The do not need political influence. It is basis economic
>>common sense that if all the telephone traffic moves to
>>a VoIP network that the VoIP have to have a charging
>>mechanism that pays for thet network as otherwise in the
>>long term they will have no product.
>
> VoIP don't need to pay for any network, in the UK you are FORCED to have
> to pay BT for a DSL line to have broadband, which in turn IS the network
> upkeep.
But you are going to have to pay *someone* to get and maintain your DSL
line.
> What is more appalling is BT getting money for residential line
> rental and ONTOP of that, more from the DSL lines. Most the network is
> digital, it costs them no more to service one over the other.
>
You are getting an extra service on top of your normal phone line.
> This is one reason the people HATE BT, they want their pie and eat it. So
> we will continue to use VoIP to deprive their New Liebour shareholders /
> donors money.
>
> Dariusz
--
Replace the by by blueyonder
.
- References:
- Working Lunch and VOIP
- From: Stuart
- Re: Working Lunch and VOIP
- From: tim \(moved to sweden\)
- Working Lunch and VOIP
- Prev by Date: Cricket
- Next by Date: Re: Whatever Happend To.."The Family" BBC 1974?
- Previous by thread: Re: Working Lunch and VOIP
- Next by thread: Re: Working Lunch and VOIP
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|