Re: A rant from the Times on line

Rosalind Mitchell wrote:
Hugh Oxford wrote:

But frankly, he's an antidote to the joyless political and petty
bureaucratic dross that seek to meddle in our lives, deprive us of our
liberties, and restrict our speech. And that's why I like him.

What are you not allowed to say, Hugh? I can't say I'd noticed you being
reticent in your views, and you haven't been hauled off to the gulag yet...

Rosiw


I said they SEEK to do these things.
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: My thoughts on statuatory rape
    ... But yet you claim that people do EXACTLY that when they vote to restrict ... their liberty on what age groups they can have sex with. ... restrict their own liberties all the time. ... and adults are rarely very submissive. ...
    (sci.med)
  • Re: Arriba Castro
    ... only referring to how the US will restrict any ... Reasonable time and place limits on speech are not ... prohibited under the SCt's reading of the First Amendment. ... there would be a First Amendment violation if the government ...
    (alt.sports.baseball.bos-redsox)
  • Re: Arriba Castro
    ... only referring to how the US will restrict any ... Reasonable time and place limits on speech are not ... prohibited under the SCt's reading of the First Amendment. ... there would be a First Amendment violation if the government ...
    (alt.sports.baseball.bos-redsox)
  • Re: Fairness Doctrine unconstitutional
    ... right wing pap presently provided 24/7 restrict anybody's speech? ... Firstly, the speech at risk of being restricted isn't the listener's, ... Fairness Doctrine constitutional because "The First Amendment does not ... Golden Globes on Fox. ...
    (soc.retirement)
  • Re: WOW
    ... > trying to restrict my freedom of speech, Mr. TROUT? ...
    (alt.vacation.las-vegas)
Loading