Re: Spoiler Wednesday
- From: Serena Blanchflower <nospam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 14 Apr 2007 09:52:18 +0100
* Marjorie Clarke wrote, On 12/04/2007 14:30:
"Suzi" <suzi@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:MPG.20883be9679988d5989ad6@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxIn article <461e2a58$0$8751$ed2619ec@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,Yes, probably. But I can't really blame her. She's already been humiliated once, and has no wish to have it happen again on a grand scale. If Rory came to live with them, they would always have to explain to people that he was Brian's child from an adulterous relationship - she'd have no hope of ever putting it behind her. It's a lot to ask of anyone, particularly a grandmother who's recently been contemplating a comfortable retirement.
Marjorie Clarke dontusethisaddess@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wibbled...
[Snip]She's also very concerned for Alice and wants to protect her from findingYes, but that all seems to be rather secondary to the "what will the
out what her Dad's been up to. And then there's Kate, Nolly and co, who
don't know (do they?).
neighbours think?" and "what about poor me?" attitudes...
Agreed
--
Cheers, Serena
Don't part with your illusions. When they are gone, you may still exist, but you have ceased to live.
(Mark Twain)
.
- References:
- Spoiler Wednesday
- From: Serena Blanchflower
- Re: Spoiler Wednesday
- From: Tony Gardner
- Re: Spoiler Wednesday
- From: Serena Blanchflower
- Re: Spoiler Wednesday
- From: Bob E
- Re: Spoiler Wednesday
- From: Serena Blanchflower
- Re: Spoiler Wednesday
- From: Suzi
- Re: Spoiler Wednesday
- From: Marjorie Clarke
- Re: Spoiler Wednesday
- From: Suzi
- Re: Spoiler Wednesday
- From: Marjorie Clarke
- Spoiler Wednesday
- Prev by Date: Re: Spoiler Wednesday
- Next by Date: Re: Tuesday nights broadcast and SPOILER Wedsnesday 11/4/07
- Previous by thread: Re: Spoiler Wednesday
- Next by thread: Re: Spoiler Wednesday
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|