Re: So Farewell


"Stephen" <stephenbowden@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:ferre25q0a4bp5h7cakrc15qsko2ekv1ab@xxxxxxxxxx
On Thu, 24 Aug 2006 19:16:18 +0200, Sebastian Lisken
<Sebastian.Lisken@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Stephen wrote:
Does anybody know how I can remove a stray Kuiper Belt Object from the
database of the Stellarium programme that Sebastian recently
recommended? I'd hate to be out of line with the IAU.

:-) You would need to edit ssystem.ini in the data subdirectory. It has
sections about all planets and their moons, plus Pluto and Charon.
(Whether Charon would be a moon of Pluto or the two are a binary system
is not yet finally determined, regardless of Pluto's classification.)

This file has Unix line breaks so it won't edit well with Notepad under
Windows. jEdit is an excellent and free text editor (Java-based, Open
Source) that would deal with this. http://www.jedit.org/ is its website.

I have yet to decide about making that change, although I think the IAU
have made the right decision. I've posted a comment in the "OT: Planets"
thread

(http://groups.google.com/group/uk.media.radio.archers/msg/f52425f20673593a
).

Pluto wasn't discovered. It never happened. Forget you ever heard the
name.

Well, dwarf planets get discovered too ... And I think the remarkable
BBC News article "The girl who named a planet"
(http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/4596246.stm) would not need
to be changed either - it was a planet when she named it.

If Pluto were discovered today, I believe that "Pluto" would not be an
acceptable name for it, as Pluto is not a Creation deity, unless one
takes a very broad definition of what counts as a Creation Myth.

<http://www.ss.astro.umd.edu/IAU/csbn/mpnames.shtml>


Well, we've got Xena, so should Pluto now become Buffy?

J


.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: "Pluto Now Called a Plutoid"
    ... orbit if there are no orbits intersecting it that are greater in mass than Ceres." ... If you include moons in consideration the first definition eliminates Earth, Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus, Neptune, Pluto, and Eris. ... In the second definition Pluto and Eris are sometimes planets and sometimes non-planets depending on how the other large Kuiper belt objects are arranged on any given day. ... The fundamental point here, which you're skipping over, is the IAU has never said what they mean. ...
    (rec.arts.sf.science)
  • Re: So Farewell
    ... sections about all planets and their moons, plus Pluto and Charon. ... This file has Unix line breaks so it won't edit well with Notepad under ... I have yet to decide about making that change, although I think the IAU ... I've posted a comment in the "OT: Planets" ...
    (uk.media.radio.archers)
  • Re: Soon 12 planets in the solar system !
    ... All I say is that the IAU proposal is a RATIONAL (and nothing but *just ... not mean that we should give free reign to our arbitrarieness. ... And taking Pluto, i.e. the second most massive KBO known, as the lower ... not) and adding planets to an ever growing list. ...
    (sci.astro.amateur)
  • Re: Why I am satisfied with the new IAU definition of planet
    ... It was inevitable that no matter what the IAU decided about the ... Going into the debate I was in favor of keeping Pluto as a planet. ... with how planets form or a basic characteristic such as primary composition. ... Sales will follow of course. ...
    (sci.astro.amateur)
  • Re: So Farewell
    ... sections about all planets and their moons, plus Pluto and Charon. ... This file has Unix line breaks so it won't edit well with Notepad under ... I have yet to decide about making that change, although I think the IAU ... I've posted a comment in the "OT: Planets" ...
    (uk.media.radio.archers)
Loading