Re: Will's holiday
- From: badriya <asft99@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 11 Mar 2006 14:22:11 +0000
On Sat, 11 Mar 2006 12:11:28 GMT, "Steve Brooks"
<steveb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I also disagree with Clarrie. But it's the flight I think is wrong. Ever
since I watched some poor child suffering all the way back from IIRC
Helsinki I've been convinced that babies should only be taken on planes when
absolutely necessary. They just can't handle the pressure changes.
I thought it was supposed to be ok if you fed them on takeoff and
landing? Sucking equalises the pressure, which is why they used to
give you sweets to suck. They no longer do that, but I take some with
me.
And I felt sorry for Ed as he's struggling to have enough money for every
day stuff because Will
ruined his chance of a better job.
Will never got any comeback over that. I don't think Clarrie was told
about it.
I still than that particular bit of spite may come back to bite him.
I very much hope so. I haven't really liked Will for a long time and
most of the time did like Ed. I'm neutral about Emma. I think she's
rather cold and did hope Ed would not get involved with her. But I
think their having to stay in the area is a pity. They should in some
way move away and be able to get on with their life. Only then Emma
loses the support of her mother and Clarrie.
Maybe Will could have a fatal accident. SWs? Are you there?
--
Vicky
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Will's holiday
- From: Suzi
- Re: Will's holiday
- From: Kim Andrews
- Re: Will's holiday
- References:
- Will's holiday
- From: Marjorie Clarke
- Re: Will's holiday
- From: Anne Burgess
- Re: Will's holiday
- From: Anne Burgess
- Re: Will's holiday
- From: badriya
- Re: Will's holiday
- From: Steve Brooks
- Will's holiday
- Prev by Date: Re: Soap & Flannel week of 12 March 2006
- Next by Date: Re: Will's holiday
- Previous by thread: Re: Will's holiday
- Next by thread: Re: Will's holiday
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|