Re: OED (now complex numbers)
- From: BrritSki <BrritSki@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2006 11:27:15 +0000
Stephen wrote:
According to the opalescent prose of rf@xxxxxxxxxxxx (Robin Fairbairns) :
badriya <asft99@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
On Mon, 16 Jan 2006 22:30:55 GMT, stephenbowden@xxxxxxxxx (Stephen) wrote:
According to the opalescent prose of spambin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Tony Gardner) :
So, by purely mathematical analysis, Maxwell had predicted the
existence of a type of radiation that we now know as electromagnetic
radiation and, at the same time, had provided compelling
circumstantial evidence to suggest that visible light was a form of
this new radiation.
Was this before or after he started attacking demons with his silver hammer?
when did he hit them with a hammer? given that they were mere philosophical constructs, i thought he treated them really rather well. he did a job evaluation, and decided it was too much to expect any demon (philosophical or otherwise) to do.
I refer the honourable umrat to Apple PCS 7068 STEREO, side A track 3.
Bang bang ! You shot him down :) .
- References:
- Re: OED
- From: Fenny
- Re: OED
- From: Gumrat
- Re: OED
- From: Fenny
- Re: OED
- From: Gumrat
- Re: OED
- From: Siderius Nuncius
- Re: OED
- From: Gumrat
- Re: OED
- From: Siderius Nuncius
- Re: OED (now complex numbers)
- From: Jim Easterbrook
- Re: OED (now complex numbers)
- From: Siderius Nuncius
- Re: OED (now complex numbers)
- From: Tony Gardner
- Re: OED (now complex numbers)
- From: Stephen
- Re: OED (now complex numbers)
- From: badriya
- Re: OED (now complex numbers)
- From: Robin Fairbairns
- Re: OED (now complex numbers)
- From: Stephen
- Re: OED
- Prev by Date: Re: OT: BearPaw Scanner
- Next by Date: Re: OED
- Previous by thread: Re: OED (now complex numbers)
- Next by thread: Re: OED (now complex numbers)
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading