Re: Or Piles - Sunday 11/12 + Mon 12/12

In message <MPG.1e0817ebc2ed52f989870@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Suzi <spamtrap@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes 
In article <kujqj8bdpn93$.1adoutgtm6jyx$.dlg@xxxxxxxxxx>, Serena
Blanchflower nospam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wibbled...

On Mon, 12 Dec 2005 20:12:34 GMT, Tony Gardner wrote:

> After Monday night, I'm not too hopeful.
>
> I've noticed that the SWs just *love* dramatic irony.  Seen in that
> light, all that stuff about "I'm feeling so much better now" and "I'll
> be OK, I promise" etc. sounds very ominous.

Yes, that worried me, as well.

> Wofe offered the opinion that Betty will recover from the coronary,
> but suffer a massive stroke (brought on by her high blood pressure)
> and become incapacitated.  Life in the Tucker household will become
> (even more) unbearable for Hayley, as the full burden of looking after
> Moike and Betty, as well as Roy and Feeble, falls on her.  Hilarious
> consequences ensue.
>
> Wofe is not an umrat, but can I OP this on her behalf?

Of course.  I have a nasty feeling that she may well have custody of
the crystal ball at the moment.   Especially when you add in the risk
of a brain haemorrhage, caused by a the clot busting drug...


After tonight's epi I definitely think Betty won't see out the New
Year...

Don't agree with this. I think the para-medics bit was something new probably : it seemed very detailed to me.

And I think they chose Betty deliberately. She's not particularly 'old', she appeared to be very fit - yet there was this hidden 'blood pressure'. And I don't know about anyone else, but there's a lot of warnings about high blood pressure and that it may lead to heart attacks and strokes. Hidden warnings and all that.

Sincerely Chris
Suzi 

--
Chris McMillan
http://www.chinavision.org.uk/
.

Quantcast