Re: Tiscali strike out application!


"Jason Russell" <invalid@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:Nt2dnZKcSNnKIBHenZ2dnUVZ8qWdnZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> In news:438caf85@xxxxxxxxxxxxx,
> Ken <biter@xxxxxxxx> typed:
> > "Gotcha" <me@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> > news:3v3o6rF13inamU1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >>
> >> "Jason Russell" <invalid@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> >> news:DNednb78ZfoePhHeRVnyjg@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> >>>
> >>> Is there a website with all these documents avalible for the
> >>> general public? I've not seen anything on any newsfeeds about the
> >>> upcoming case.
> >>
> >> That could be seen as a contempt of court, especially by your friend
> >> bunt. I'm surprised he doesn't keep you in the loop.
> >
> >
> > Ironic that ..................bunty has clearly been in contempt of
> > court himself, several times already!
> >
> > But I guess he is the only person in this that the outcome of the case
> > doesnt matter to a fig............probably borrowed the money for
> > court fees, and not being a home owner, and having no assets to speak
> > of, really has nothing whatsoever to lose (except having to face
> > becoming more of a laughing stock, should he lose of course).
> >
> > k
>
> Ken
>
> I didn't ask for your opinion on John Bunt's Finances - I just asked a
> honest and valid question.

Funnily enough, he was replying to me.

>
> I can now see why you have managed to get yourself into this trouble, and
> who you have kept making the hole deeper and deeper.
>
> I also suspect that John Bunt has at no time been in contempt of court,
> because that would have pretty much killed the action at that point.
>
> If you're not able to produce evidence due to matters being sub judice,
just
> for fucks sake say so -

But you already knew it was sub judice, or so you said. Why do you wish to
*** stir?


.

Quantcast