Re: Children in need?
- From: "Harry.S" <bema34@xxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 20 Nov 2005 09:21:09 -0000
"The Ancient Geek" <spam@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:fCSff.245318$iC7.99386@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Dotcom Computers Ltd wrote:
>> We have enough problems on our own streets, let alone dealing with Africa
>> and Asia.
>
> Unless the basis of Children in Need has changed in the past year, I think
> you'll find they provide funds to a lot of UK-based schemes and charities.
> I think you may be confusing "Children in Need" with "Comic Relief".
>
>
> The key issue with these things, in my opinion, is that the money raised
> from and by ordinary members of the public, pales into insignificance with
> some of the Government spending.
>
> The need for charity appeals would be vastly reduced, if those in power
> got their priorities right.
Those in power have got their priorities right..............If they hadnt
they wouldnt be in power!
Seems strange that in the age of the Internet, that several individuals on
this group seem to have very little grasp of what goes on in the real world!
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Children in need?
- From: Adrian_S
- Re: Children in need?
- References:
- Children in need?
- From: paulshancox
- Re: Children in need?
- From: Dotcom Computers Ltd
- Re: Children in need?
- From: The Ancient Geek
- Children in need?
- Prev by Date: Re: Regulars?
- Next by Date: Re: Regulars?
- Previous by thread: Re: Children in need?
- Next by thread: Re: Children in need?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|