Re: I would have thought
- From: MikeCampbell <mikes.news@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 28 Aug 2005 20:58:21 +0100
On Sun, 28 Aug 2005 19:35:25 +0000 (UTC), <nothereat2@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> "MikeCampbell" <mikes.news@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:im64j452jeth.dlg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> On Sun, 28 Aug 2005 00:36:36 +0000 (UTC), Ken wrote:
>>
>>> "Inspector Frost" <inspfrost@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>>> news:deqg9b$kne$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>> with it being a courtroom procedure, everyone would have the sense to
> stop
>>>> keep posting about it in here?
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Its not even been listed, so anyone is free to say whatever they want.
> What
>>> they cannot do though is to abuse the very strict rules relating to
> personal
>>> information provided under the terms of a court order.
>>>
>>> ken
>>
>> You've been outed you dipshit!! People could sign you up for allsorts of
>> stuff now!! Thats if they where bad minded and daft enough?
>
> Doesnt get a lot more loony than taking someone to court for no
> reason................does it?
>
You lunatic, you don't know when enoughs enough. You may as well of wrote
to him and asked him to take you to court, it would of saved us all from
reading your boring, predictive,unfunny posts. Go get some sleep you idiot.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: I would have thought
- From: Guy Fawkes
- Re: I would have thought
- References:
- I would have thought
- From: Inspector Frost
- Re: I would have thought
- From: Ken
- Re: I would have thought
- From: MikeCampbell
- Re: I would have thought
- From: Guy Fawkes
- I would have thought
- Prev by Date: Re: ABUSING THE COURT WITH DODGY INJUNCTIONS
- Next by Date: Re: ABUSING THE COURT WITH DODGY INJUNCTIONS
- Previous by thread: Re: I would have thought
- Next by thread: Re: I would have thought
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|