Re: Lack of response?
- From: "Ken" <nothereat2@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2005 23:18:19 +0000 (UTC)
"Andrew Taylor" <andrewcrumplehorn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:430e2468_3@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> "Connie" <me@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:3n674dF2f87U1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >
> > Thats why they are called the Civil Procedure Rules!
> > Doh!
> >
> Thank you. An acronym that escaped me.
>
As has the fact that BTC is a complete and utter ***, intent on
commiting a serious fraud, with the help of others!
ken
.
- References:
- Lack of response?
- From: gaspode
- Re: Lack of response?
- From: Just Another Residents Fan
- Re: Lack of response?
- From: TNR
- Re: Lack of response?
- From: gaspode
- Re: Lack of response?
- From: TNR
- Re: Lack of response?
- From: Guy Fawkes
- Re: Lack of response?
- From: Guy Fawkes
- Re: Lack of response?
- From: paulshancox
- Re: Lack of response?
- From: TNR
- Re: Lack of response?
- From: gaspode
- Re: Lack of response?
- From: TNR
- Re: Lack of response?
- From: gaspode
- Re: Lack of response?
- From: Andrew Taylor
- Re: Lack of response?
- From: Connie
- Re: Lack of response?
- From: Andrew Taylor
- Lack of response?
- Prev by Date: Re: Lack of response?
- Next by Date: Re: Lack of response?
- Previous by thread: Re: Lack of response?
- Next by thread: Re: Lack of response?
- Index(es):