Re: Have a care - Contempt of Court


"Harvey Wallbanger" <me9@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:ddkqjt$de7$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Do you mean like publishing names and addresses of people gained by court
> order for the purpose of litigation only?
>


All the names and adresses had been published on usenet previously, and I
find it very peculiar that Bunt paid BT £220 to find my details.

ken


.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Have a care - Contempt of Court
    ... Do you mean like publishing names and addresses of people gained by court ... order for the purpose of litigation only? ... Prev by Date: ...
    (uk.local.southwest)
  • Re: Trial of the Century: US vs Philip Morris, et. al
    ... >doesn't necessarily mean the litigants will be favored in court. ... The purpose of litigation is not to get people talking about issues. ... Sandi ...
    (sci.med.transcription)
  • Re: Court Examines Putins Phallus
    ... the case went to the Greek Supreme Court. ... British law is the opposite: the defendant bears the burden of proving ... British libel laws also offer no ... backed down on publishing British editions of two bestselling ...
    (soc.culture.baltics)
  • Re: Authority of the Almanach of Gotha
    ... of the State of Gotha, and enforced by the court and courts of Gotha, ... Or is it a publication issued by private ... publishing firm, and later by other publishers (Paul Mevius, ...
    (alt.talk.royalty)
  • Re: Legal threats from Calderdale council
    ... highly improper email making threats, ... or had the effect of *me* publishing the data in ... court hearing at some later date. ... I don't see any subversion. ...
    (uk.legal)
Loading