Re: Iran enabling terrorists to go remote . . .

On 2006-05-25, Ducks-R-US <bad@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

"Whiskers" <catwheezel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:8j6ek3-imc.ln1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

snip

: > It's because you're not using WIN XP, and IE. You could try editing
: > the link down to http://www.foxnews.com/video2/player05.html, and see what
: > happens!
:
: Nope; not a lot of difference. By now, if the story had any substance
: outside the Fox corporation's world view, I've probably 'got it' from
: other sources anyway.

The Video shows a remote controlled helicopter like the Iranians have
been supplying Hamas to spy on Israel with Cameras attached, except that
this one has shot guns attached, and then again, you could have IED
(improvised explosive devises attached), and made that comment, that there
is no counter measure to this or other innovative ideas terrorist come up
with, except for an offensive measure that breaks down their networks, and
going after the States that sponsor them, like we had to Afghanistan and
Iraq. I remind you Saddam was paying the families of homicide bombers,
$200,000 US Dollars a pop, every time they struck Israel with his crooked UN
Oil For Money scam. And lest you forget your History, we have
Briton/England to thank for helping push for and establish the modern State
of Israel after World War II, the only long running Democracy in the Middle
East!

Basically, every Democracy has to take an offensive measure, or risk
becoming a (pardon the pun) "sitting duck" and I don't think you're
Grandmammy or Grandpappy enjoyed being "sitting ducks" when Hitler was
bombing London and England! ;)

This is the wrong group to try and start up a 'discussion' about the pros
and cons of who should or shouldn't be killed by whom and how, unless all
those concerned are living in London.

--
-- ^^^^^^^^^^
-- Whiskers
-- ~~~~~~~~~~
.