Re: Marine Mother Stirs Nation on Rush Limbaugh Show

*C. Socrates Lewis* wrote:
>>> Initiating Subspace Link with node@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> Transmission from USS Interrogation NCC-1968G
>>> Subject: Then how come you didn't know "Row, row, row, your boat?"
>
> "John of Aix" <j.murphy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:4305907a$0$905$8fcfb975@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>
>> Bwahahaha. Not only did you bring Sept 11th or a similar arttack on
>> yourselves as a result of decades of misguided and dishonest foreign
>> policy but in retaliation you attacked a country that had nothing
>> whatsoever to do with it and in so doing have made the world, and
>> your own country, a far more unsafe place. Dopes the lot of you who
>> support that lunatic Bush and his murderous gang.
> You have to wonder if legalized drugs over there isn't ruining some
> of your all's minds! Its been proven long term use of pot leads to
> schizophrenia, and the brain damage is irreversible. Like the world
> has never had anything to fear of Muslim Radicals.

Fear 'from' dear not 'of'' in this case. You take too many drugs
obviously.

[snip completely off the point primary school history lesson]

> You already have a growing Muslim population over
> there, and their numbers are growing, because they aren't stupid and
> abort their young before they are born like the Western Countries;
> take a look you already have a healthy and growing population of them
> right there in Europe.

Yep, here in France it is estimated that about 8% of the population is
from a Muslim background. I would say at a rough guess that 85% of them
give no more a *** about Islam than western 'Christians' (the man in
the street) gives a *** about Chrisitianity. And here in France, where
I live, they line up with the laws of the state, the state does not
adapt its laws to suit them.

> You already have the Netherlands having a
> greater exodus of people from that country, than what are immigrating
> in, and part of it has to do with the growing Muslim population -
> http://news.scotsman.com/opinion.cfm?id=1438532004, something your
> own Country is worried about.

Is it, first I've heard. Net immigration into France is really quite
small.

> This War on Terrorism began in the late 70's

No it didn't, the 'war on terrorism' is an invention of the Bush regime.
That the world tried to fight terrorism in the 80s, of course, the 70s,
60s, 50s, 40s and any other decade you care to name too. We don't need
your simian leader to tell us what to do..

> and we chose to
> fight a defensive war, which has never been won in all of history.

You call attacking a defenceless country that had never threatened you
in any way, shape or form a 'defensive war' do you? I suggest you buy
yourself a dictionary.

> It's time we went on the offensive, otherwise, instead of
> conventional bombs you all had on those subways, it might have been
> Nuclear instead.

Aainst who. For ***'s sake grow up, the world isn't a Hollywood movie?

> You just lucky we stopped Hitler and saved your
> asses in WW II,

You turned up in 1942 after considerable collaboration with the Nazi
régime and you joined the war exclusively to protect your own interests,
so *** off with your stupid statements, you saved nobody.

> because his next attack against you would have been
> with a dirty bomb, and while not having the strength of the A-Bomb,
> the radioactive contamination and fallout, would have left London a
> Ghost town, not able to be lived in for decades or even centuries;

So this 'dirty bomb' of yours it is what exactly? It has radioactive
fallout but isn't nuclear? I'm no expert in physics but I'm having a
little difficulty comprehending, or should I assume this is more
off-the-top-of-my-head balderdash, at which you seem to be fairly
expert?

> and if you get attacked again by the terrorist, chances are growing
> greater and greater that they will hit you with a dirty bomb; and if
> you all let Iran go nuclear, watch out! -

In France we were stopping terrorists before you could even spell the
word, as a little research on Google will show you, so don't try to give
us lessons, your incompetence in the matter precludes you.

> http://home.earthlink.net/~paradaox3d/NukeDay.jpg As long as there
> are non-Democratic states who support terrorism and tyranny,

That is something I expect of non-democratic states, I do not expect it
of the USA but unfortunatley it is pretty close to being the case.

> there is
> always going to be need for a ready and active military.

Prove it.

> To think
> otherwise is to join the League of Nations in history's disgrace.

Nonsense. Because something fails does not mean failure is inevitable
just that it has failed for one reason or another.

> It
> time you Brits let go of the Skepticism you inherited from David
> Hume, and found your Soul and Faith once again. Both Saint Augustine
> and John Wesley would mourn what has become of you today.

What, so that we can go off gung ho and invade defenceless countries to
ensure that we can drive around in SUVs, become obese and sink to the
intellectual level of the average US American? No thanks old son, we
aren't that dumb over here.

> "We cannot become what we need to be by remaining what we are!" -
> Max DuPree

Did you get this off a Hallmark card or did even they reject it as
fourteen year old pubescent boy bollocks?


.