Re: Blog
- From: "Toooldtocare" <Toooldtocare@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 10:32:01 +0000 (UTC)
"JackH" <jackhackettuk@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:45hobrF6rtm2U1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
No I'm not... I'm not revealing how I know it's him, but 'PRAT(M)', is
him
I'm afraid.
Well well well, a lurker who isn't me! I'm most disappointed. lol
You really can't be allowed to get away with this.
Your hypocrisy has no limits, just a few posts ago you were accusing me of
casting aspersions without facts to back them up. Yet here you are making
an allegation and the most foul obscene comments about a pleasant and
innocous individual who hasn't posted for months without one iota of
proof to back it up.
You need to control your temper, when you lose it you revert to your true
colours, a very nasty piece of work.
And I wouldn't get too excited about the ULK'er calling you "not so
porky".
It's not so long ago a ULK'er told me I looked in very good condition for
my age! But as I heard those words I looked out the window and saw a pig
flying by, in your case there must have been a bloody great sty full. tbh!
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Blog
- From: JackH
- Re: Blog
- References:
- Blog
- From: Evil Clown
- Re: Blog
- From: Toooldtocare
- Re: Blog
- From: An Observer
- Re: Blog
- From: Toooldtocare
- Re: Blog
- From: JackH
- Re: Blog
- From: Toooldtocare
- Re: Blog
- From: JackH
- Re: Blog
- From: Toooldtocare
- Re: Blog
- From: JackH
- Re: Blog
- From: Toooldtocare
- Re: Blog
- From: JackH
- Re: Blog
- From: Toooldtocare
- Re: Blog
- From: JackH
- Re: Blog
- From: Harry Keane
- Re: Blog
- From: Baldrick
- Re: Blog
- From: JackH
- Re: Blog
- From: Baldrick
- Re: Blog
- From: JackH
- Blog
- Prev by Date: Baldrick and tooold
- Next by Date: Re: Baldrick and tooold
- Previous by thread: Re: Blog
- Next by thread: Re: Blog
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|