Re: Well I never.......




""screaming" Mad Mike the ***" <diemens.quirito@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:dqg5be$dc4$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

"Mick" <Mick@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:dqdp5p$2b4$0@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

""screaming" Mad Mike the ***" <diemens.quirito@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:dqdilr$hp8$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

"Mick" <Mick@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:dqda82$vuc$0@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

"G©" <gaoler@NOPSPAM> wrote in message news:43c99b43$0$19820$9a6e19ea@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

And I don't think the laws of physics change if I move to Mars or
any
where else.

I watched Horizon not so long ago and they explored this. They are now suggesting that the laws of physics are not all the seem to be especially when you start to delve into quantumn physics ... it was really interesting but too much info .. most of which i cannot remember to list here. Part of it explored parallell universes (spelling ?) and this was when standard physics was thrown into doubt

"laws" imply order.


No they don't. There are laws relating to a randomness

My experiences of creating randomness are that large numbers are required - therefore your randomness is still within the constraints of your large number - not true randomness but random enough to give the perception of truly random.

Please explain your laws relating to randomness.

Order is achieved through careful thought.  Careful
thought requires consciousness.  Consciousness is a requisite for what
we call intelligence.

No it isn't. This tries to imply that order requires intelligence and it doesn't, look at ants!

What about ants? That they achieve order through the release of pheromones, therefore they are communicating on some basic level.... therefore there is an element of intelligence to what we see as their very basic ability to create order.

You can achieve a non-conscious trance-like state and still be
intelligent.  Intelligence is inherent but I accept you have to be in a
conscious state to utilise intelligence.

.... oh do keep up. Consciousness is required.

If the universe can be governed by laws, science and logic would have
us
believe that this is proof of a maker.

Worth consideration?

Nope. Your last paragraph doesn't follow from your first and neither is it logical or factual. Perhaps you meant that science and logic dictate that a "maker" exists as an "intelligence" must have been involved. Either way it doesn't follow.

Laws imply order.

If the universe can be governed by laws ........ etc

Yes they do. Try and read the entire post.

I did, you successfully used a reductio ad absurdum argument which defeated your own premise.


.