Re: ulk lurkers thread
- From: "Dr Q" <wherehaveall@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2005 18:28:50 GMT
"JackH" <jackhackettuk@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:3sn5tjFov1ckU1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> "Dr Q" <quincy1uk@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:1130769507.291864.181570@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>> All I know is there are a few genuine people in here I do consider
>> friends for helping me with various different things and just offering
>> support over the last few years, if I want to leave a message for them
>> when I cant get hold of them other ways, so be it. If you dont like it,
>> block my messages.
>
> With respect, when you've proven that usenet is a more reliable medium for
> directly contacting another person, than phoning (caller ID is quite
> common
> these days, as are answerphones) / texting (complete with delivery reports
> if you so wish) / emailing them (and with the opportunity to request a
> receipt with certain email programs), you may have a valid point.
Ahhh, so I'm a cheapskate!!!! I cant help it.
>
> Oh, and ':-P'
>
> --
> JackH
>
>
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: ulk lurkers thread
- From: JackH
- Re: ulk lurkers thread
- References:
- ulk lurkers thread
- From: Astraman
- Re: ulk lurkers thread
- From: Bobby Bewl
- Re: ulk lurkers thread
- From: Astraman
- Re: ulk lurkers thread
- From: Dr Q
- Re: ulk lurkers thread
- From: JackH
- ulk lurkers thread
- Prev by Date: Re: ulk lurkers thread
- Next by Date: Re: ulk lurkers thread
- Previous by thread: Re: ulk lurkers thread
- Next by thread: Re: ulk lurkers thread
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|