Re: Attention Rai, JB, DrQ, BB & WebMonkey

JB wrote:
> "Dr Q" <wherehaveall@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:Hq89f.9680$sA4.6479@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>
>> "JB" <JB@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>> news:dk33sa$6qr$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>
>>> "Dr Q" <wherehaveall@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>>> news:cl89f.9679$sA4.4096@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>
>>>> "JB" <JB@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>>>> news:dk338h$881$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>
>>>>> "Mick" <Mick@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>>>>> news:1130695246.74b06e1225a087f98b6e101c0b7d7cf4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "JB" <JB@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>>>>>> news:dk31bg$co$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> "Mick" <Mick@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>>>>>>> news:1130694504.753e64ac50dd070d1b8437e1e0e41c6e@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> "JB" <JB@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>>>>>>>> news:dk30gk$re1$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> "Mick" <Mick@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>>>>>>>>>
> news:1130693761.0ae35715a2b4c2678798ec4228e9e6c0@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>>>>>> I wish to make it clear that the person purporting to be me
>>>>>>>>>> yesterday
>>>>>>>>>> was
>>>>>>>>>> not me. I was drunk all day and have no recollection of
>>>>>>>>>> posting. It seems
>>>>>>>>>> that yet again ulk has been infiltrated by imposters.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Normal 15 minute service has now resumed as I've sobered up,
>>>>>>>>>> just! :-)
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> That would explain the emails you sent then ;-)
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> JB
>>>>>>>>> x
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Just caught this one at 14 minutes. No I remember one email :-)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Well Im not sure how many you remember but you certainly sent
>>>>>>> some more,
>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>> say I was shocked, was an understatement... ;-) Lol.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> JB
>>>>>>> x
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 17 minutes. Were you impressed though? :-)
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> With the content or the photos attached???? ;-)
>>>>
>>>> I want a photo!!!!!!!!!!!!!! :o(
>>>>
>>> Well, will forward you a few that were sent but be warned Q,
>>> they're a bit near the mark... lol ;-) I mean, I almost blushed!!!
>>
>> Cor, didnt realise Mick was into those "soft porn scenarios!"
>>
> Hey.... just shows you eh? .... well each to their own I guess but
> not sure I liked the one with the donkey involved... poor thing, did
> you see it's sad little face (the donkey that is)... ;-)

Its not "soft porn". They call it beastiality I think. I wouldnt know.



.

Relevant Pages