Re: hmmm


"Mick" <Mick@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1129838143.8819e1efaee9db030857e350639cd80e@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> "Foot Manta" <hurk@xxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:dj7r44$jtg$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>
>> "Mick" <Mick@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>> news:1129492285.0ca4fcb3f65b7720b8e283df0e410606@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>
>>> "Fat Mantra" <hurk@xxxxxx> wrote in message
>>> news:diqnlv$2bk$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>
>>> <snip>
>>>
>>>>> I have no need to question your credibility, I merely point out if
>>>>> you
>>>>> berate a poster for quoting statistics without a source some might
>>>>> think
>>>>> it incumbent to indicate your source when quoting historical
>>>>> coincidences.
>>>>
>>>> Read back. I berated the poster for finding the statistics
>>>> acceptable -
>>>> for seeing a 20% failure rate as quite an achievement. I don't care
>>>> where he got the statistics from. Why are you so offended on his
>>>> behalf? You seem to have taken it a bit personally on his behalf.
>>>> i'm
>>>> sure he's ok and will be back promoting views I don't agree with, and
>>>> i'll take them up with him if he does, or take his side if he debates
>>>> something and I agree with him.
>>>>
>>>
>>> I might be stupid but my memory appears to be better than yours. On the
>>> 25th September you posted on the Education thread
>>>
>>> " If i've told you once i've told you 3 times....
>>> don't hand in statistics without quoting their source."
>>>
>>> You now say in relation to the same thread "I don't care where he got
>>> his
>>> statistics from". If you can square these two statements then credible
>>> is
>>> not the best word to describe you.
>>
>> A throw-away comment and easy to spot line of humour. If i cared that
>> much about his source I would have pursued it, but as i said, I don't
>> really care that much and was more concerned with the point MB made,
>> that to accept that level of failure is unacceptable.
>
> You suggested I read back and I did. I'm just reporting it. I've made a
> note for future reference not to consider consistency a quality you
> consider worthy in a discussion.

Still that "special interest" in me and my qualities. And the only one to
be that passionate about what I say. Though as of yet, you haven't debated
any issue with me directly.... just some of my personal "qualities". Shame
really, you seem quite an articulate fellow.

>>> As to the rest of your reply your extrapolation of what went before on
>>> this thread to this personal stuff eludes me.
>>>
>>>> You don't need to take up anyone elses fight here after the event. It
>>>> gives the impression you have trouble letting go of grudges or issues.
>>>>
>>>>> You are even more suspicious than some of the others on here. God
>>>>> help
>>>>> me
>>>>> if I acquire some of those characteristics :-)
>>>>
>>>> Being suspicious means always being prepared for the worst. Its got
>>>> me
>>>> this far. ;-)
>>>>
>>>
>>> Hmmm, that was my point :-)
>>
>> Why are you trying to make a personal point over a group discussion?
>> Odd that you should single me out for an analysis of my responses in
>> order to confirm suspicions of my mental characterstics don't you think?
>> Almost like you are paying particular interest to me. Why is that?
>>
>> It seems a little odd, don't you think? I don't get that feeling from
>> any other current poster... so the oversuspicion, paranoia diagnosis is
>> out of the window.
>>
>> I've yet to see you perform an autopsy on any other thread and poster,
>> but i'll look forward to it, if only to prove to myself that you aren't
>> paying an unhealthy amount of attention to me. :-)
>
> Autopsy? analysis? paranoia? lol what are you talking about?

I think i've made that quite clear. Which part don't you understand?

> Hmmm, take a leaf out of your own book and read your last three
> paragraphs again. And then have a cup of tea.

I don't drink tea. You are a little odd though, wouldn't you agree? Is
there anyone else that you're paying close attention too other than JB of
course? Now I know your reasons for paying close attention to JB (or at
least I can imagine), but just what is it about me? Hope they're not the
same reasons ;-)


.