Re: hmmm
"Fat Mantra" <hurk@xxxxxx> wrote in message
news:diqnlv$2bk$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
<snip>
I have no need to question your credibility, I merely point out if you
berate a poster for quoting statistics without a source some might
think
it incumbent to indicate your source when quoting historical
coincidences.
Read back. I berated the poster for finding the statistics acceptable -
for seeing a 20% failure rate as quite an achievement. I don't care
where he got the statistics from. Why are you so offended on his
behalf? You seem to have taken it a bit personally on his behalf. i'm
sure he's ok and will be back promoting views I don't agree with, and
i'll take them up with him if he does, or take his side if he debates
something and I agree with him.
I might be stupid but my memory appears to be better than yours. On the
25th September you posted on the Education thread
" If i've told you once i've told you 3 times....
don't hand in statistics without quoting their source."
You now say in relation to the same thread "I don't care where he got his
statistics from". If you can square these two statements then credible is
not the best word to describe you.
As to the rest of your reply your extrapolation of what went before on
this thread to this personal stuff eludes me.
You don't need to take up anyone elses fight here after the event. It
gives the impression you have trouble letting go of grudges or issues.
You are even more suspicious than some of the others on here. God help
me
if I acquire some of those characteristics :-)
Being suspicious means always being prepared for the worst. Its got me
this far. ;-)
Hmmm, that was my point :-)
.
