Re: Wanderer?


The Wanderer wrote:
> On 29 Jan 2006 03:08:28 -0800, Ken wrote:
>
> > The Wanderer wrote:
> >> On 28 Jan 2006 23:58:43 -0800, Ken wrote:
> >>
> >>> If like "Wanderer" you understand that I am a child abuser,
> >>
> >> Post the message ID where I have suggested such a thing. You can't because
> >> I never have. Retract that statement, or remain exposed as the liar and
> >> fantasist that you really are.
> >>
> >> I think you're a sad and inadequate pratt, and a hopeless and totally inept
> >> troll, but that's another thing altogether.
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> the dot wanderer at tesco dot net
> >
> > You seem very very dim Mike..............
>
> Oh dear, got it wrong again Chris. I'm not Mike. Of course, you really know
> nothing about me, except that I don't like liars, fantasists and social
> inadequates. I don't like you.
>
> >I have all of your postings
>
> I'm flattered
>
> > making wrongful allegations of child abuse carefullly archived, even
> > though you deleted these soon after making them,
>
> Not me. Post a message ID to support your allegations or apologise.
>
> I've never deleted a post from Google. To the best of my recollection I've
> issued just two or three 'cancels' in all that time, when I've duplicated a
> post, or similar.
>
> > as you realised you
> > could well have found yourself in trouble with the police over this
> > sort of thing!
>
> Nope, not me. I'd not like to pass comment about whether the same could be
> said about you.
>
> > People like you are cowardly in the extreme, as rather than admitting
> > your wrong doing and apoligising for your abberations, you generate a
> > series of socks which attack anyone pointing out what a complete ***
> > you really are!
>
> I have *never* posted under any identity except Wanderer in the last 10 to
> 15 years that I've been on usenet. I have *never* used socks, which is more
> than can be said about you, not have I resorted to anonymous remailers.
> I've never made a malicious or defamatory posting about you. Post a message
> ID in support of your claims and I'll apologise unreservedly.
>
> I've certainly said that I think you're an odious liar and social
> inadequate who resorts to making wild and unfounded claims when challenged
> about some of your more outlandish comments in various NGs. I've seen
> nothing from you that makes me want change that opinion of you.
>
> Now *you* put up or apologise and shut up - if you're man enough, that is.
>
> --
> the dot wanderer at tesco dot net


I am prepared to meet you on a 1 to 1 basis at any
time.................I dont like being wrongfully accused of child
abuse, and would very much like to get this sorted!

Its heartening to hear that you feel accusing people of the most
hienous offences, with no proof whatsoever is reflective of the fact
that you dont tell lies! Anyway feel free to get in touch about meeting
up to get this worked out.............but not holding my breath though.

k

.