Re: OT: chicken and the bums rush
- From: "Blackthorn" <nenagh_uk@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2006 18:30:37 GMT
"Krustov" <me@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:MPG.1f7104d7e2ee874b989f45@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
<uk.local.glasgow>
<Blackthorn>
<Sun, 10 Sep 2006 21:02:51 GMT>
<%3%Mg.6079$s4.4034@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
www.emailuser.co.uk/countdown.php?word=10040
If ever the Internet needed justification for its existence, this is it
Its almost upto 1000 words entered or 1200 words if you include the 200
abusive words rejected in the last 24 hours .
I expected the amount of words being entered to tail off once i added
the swear word filter but that seems to have had the opposite effect .
The internet is strange at times .
I like the challenge of trying to find a rude term that won't get rejected.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: OT: chicken and the bums rush
- From: Krustov
- Re: OT: chicken and the bums rush
- References:
- OT: chicken and the bums rush
- From: Krustov
- Re: OT: chicken and the bums rush
- From: Krustov
- Re: OT: chicken and the bums rush
- From: Blackthorn
- Re: OT: chicken and the bums rush
- From: Krustov
- OT: chicken and the bums rush
- Prev by Date: Re: OT: chicken and the bums rush
- Next by Date: Re: OT: chicken and the bums rush
- Previous by thread: Re: OT: chicken and the bums rush
- Next by thread: Re: OT: chicken and the bums rush
- Index(es):