Re: john humble
- From: "Noel O'Gara" <noelogara@xxxxxx>
- Date: 22 Apr 2006 16:22:55 -0700
Brian Pears wrote:
A sequence of unproven and unsourced assertions strung
together to form a vaguely coherent story - which is what
you produced here and which is all we ever get from your
fellow boobies - does not constitute evidence. It doesn't
even come close.
There's more convincing evidence for the Tooth Fairy and
Santa Claus than for any of this Ripper crap.
Brian Pears must be some fool to believe that the confessions of a
lunatic copycat killer aka Peter Sutcliffe are solid evidence. That man
had been eliminated 12 times by those policemen.
These confession was made to ex cop Dick Holland, the cop who framed
Stefan Kiszko for murder.
Then the confessions of drunken John Humble to being the Geordie hoaxer
are great evidence to Brian.
Brian would believe anything. He may even be the tooth fairy.
I think Brian Pears of Gateshead is a very gullible fool and this
evidence proves it beyond doubt.
It takes all kinds Brian and remember the old saying about fools
rushing in. You rushed in and you dont even know what you are talking