Re: The Dhimmification of the West

On 12 May, 22:24, Johnny <Joh...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
You have an odd view of lies.

I call it as I see it. I've never had to retract such an accusation.

I imagine not. Who would think it important enough to ask you to?

I would.

You think I'm always lying.

Pretty much, yes.

And you claim I am subjective...

What lie was I caught in?

It was a general statement, not specifically related to any
particular lie.

The full blanket 'liar' accusation? Makes sense if you just
automatically assume everything I say is a lie.

The hockey stick isn't a lie.

Oh but it is - or rather it was..

And you brought it up. It's one model that's been criticised. That
stuff happens in science. It gets fixed and we move on.

Sure mistakes happen. The hockey stick wasn't a mistake. It took
considerable effort and skill to produce.

Your paranoia is showing again. Unless you can produce evidence
that the hockey stick authors were deliberately publishing known
false evidence.
Can you even point out a peer of theirs who accused them of fraud?

I daresay it can be done, but I've no more interest in trying.
You can claim victory on this point.

The hockey stick debate doesn't change the facts according
to Hadley, the IPCC, Scripps, the WGM and so many others.

The hockey stick was presented as "the facts" by the IPCC.

The hockey stick was presented as evidence along with other
overwhelming evidence. Conclusions were drawn. They became
accepted facts. Even with the hockey stick re-evaluated, the
conclusions stand. Overwhelming evidence continues to support
the conclusions, you understand, not just the hockey stick.
Climate change is not a house of cards built upon a single
flawed model.

Johnny-still-not-lying

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Pre-Clovis big-game hunters?
    ... honest than the ID perps. ... switch scam on their own creationist supporters. ... I never deny persuasive evidence. ... all you have done is lie about the issues. ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: SQPV from greys to reds?
    ... That's another lie. ... You snipped the evidence. ... "Studies have examined the effects of sea eagles on lambs. ... answers I'll start snipping yours. ...
    (uk.environment.conservation)
  • Re: SQPV from greys to reds?
    ... Two lies in a row from Angus. ... Where's your evidence? ... That, Angus, is a lie. ... mortality of lambs in an area where a significant number of lambs had ...
    (uk.environment.conservation)
  • Re: SQPV from greys to reds?
    ... That's another lie. ... Where's your evidence? ... "Studies have examined the effects of sea eagles on lambs. ... The same that give crofters large subsidies. ...
    (uk.environment.conservation)
  • Re: SQPV from greys to reds?
    ... That's another lie. ... Where's your evidence? ... "Studies have examined the effects of sea eagles on lambs. ...
    (uk.environment.conservation)