Re: Man jailed over computer password refusal
- From: "Norman Wells" <stibbons@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 6 Oct 2010 14:48:57 +0100
Mike Ross wrote:
There's NO evidence there to even put before a jury. The CPS wouldn't
go with that, and if they, in a fit of stupidity, did... the judge
would give a 'no case to answer' forthwith. If the accused
co-operates fully, or appears to, they have *nothing*, AFAICS.
Can anyone suggest any plausible reason why the above would not be
true?
Of course. It's inherently implausible that anyone who goes to the trouble of hiding his stash of whatever it is so securely away won't have taken an equal amount of trouble to be sure he can retrieve it. The (correct) presumption will therefore be that he's lying through his teeth.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Man jailed over computer password refusal
- From: Nigel Oldfield
- Re: Man jailed over computer password refusal
- From: AndyW
- Re: Man jailed over computer password refusal
- From: Mike Ross
- Re: Man jailed over computer password refusal
- References:
- Man jailed over computer password refusal
- From: Phil Stovell
- Re: Man jailed over computer password refusal
- From: Theodore
- Re: Man jailed over computer password refusal
- From: Jethro
- Re: Man jailed over computer password refusal
- From: blobber
- Re: Man jailed over computer password refusal
- From: Jethro
- Re: Man jailed over computer password refusal
- From: Big Les Wade
- Re: Man jailed over computer password refusal
- From: Jethro
- Re: Man jailed over computer password refusal
- From: Mike Ross
- Man jailed over computer password refusal
- Prev by Date: Re: It's not just the supermarkets, many other food outlets are scamming us as well
- Next by Date: Re: ACS Law - ooops
- Previous by thread: Re: Man jailed over computer password refusal
- Next by thread: Re: Man jailed over computer password refusal
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|