Re: Darwin's law strikes again...
- From: "Ret." <xxx@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 9 Sep 2010 11:01:55 +0100
Mike P wrote:
On Thu, 09 Sep 2010 10:21:11 +0100, bod boggled us with:
Mike P wrote:On Thu, 09 Sep 2010 10:10:48 +0100, Ret. boggled us with:Misogynistic, is an unfair label. Nowhere has he inferred that he
Mike P wrote:On Wed, 08 Sep 2010 20:28:44 +0100, bod boggled us with:I would suggest that that is how everyone on uk.legal would
Mike P wrote:Not at all. That's how you perceive it.On Wed, 08 Sep 2010 18:50:16 +0000, joe boggled us with:Yet you tend to get uptight about defending Muslims etc.
Maria wrote:I think you'll find it's the best attitude to have. The only
On 9/7/2010 11:09 PM, Mike P wrote:TBH it is the same as all the other posts. Unless it hasOn Tue, 07 Sep 2010 23:04:46 +0100, Brimstone boggled usIt was for us - we used to use the bike to get from Bedford
with:
"Mike P"<mikewpearson73SPAMSPAM@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in messageI'd expect them to show some humanity and give the person a
news:i66b6b$cmu$2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Tue, 07 Sep 2010 22:07:05 +0100, ian field boggled usNot now he doesn't.
with:
Doubtful - having had my motorcycle stolen and losing myYou work for a pretty shitty company, that's all I can say.
job as result (and nearly my home)
But do your eally expect an employer to keep someone on who
can't get to work?
few days to sort it out for a start.
First time it happened, my ins co provided a hire car.
2nd time it happened, my IT director got me a hire car for 2
weeks while I sorted out a replacement.
When the bike was nicked, I went on the bus for a couple of
weeks.
Not a big deal.
to St Albans - I worked in South Mimms in the middle of the
A6. I had to give up my job as we could not afford another
vehicle and there was no public tranport I could use -
insurance took 4 months to pay out and it wasn't enough.
That's how we ended up on the dole.
happened to him or his, or if it did not affect him much, then
other people should have the same approach. It is a selfish
attitude.
things that *really* matter at the end of the day are your
family, your health and not a great deal else. You'll be a lot
more relaxed if you think like that.
perceive it...
Well, a lot of people on uk.legal perceive you as a racist, sexist,
misogynistic old git.
Doesn't make them right though does it?
hates women.
Used loosely, it can just mean that someone is predjudiced against
women, which Kev has inferred that he is with his comments about them
choosing a career over a family, women going out to work being the
cause of marriage breakdowns etc etc.
I stand by those comments - and many social commentators agree with me - because I have concerns over marriage and family breakdown. Nothing to do with being prejudiced against women.
Kev
.
- References:
- Darwin's law strikes again...
- From: Ret.
- Re: Darwin's law strikes again...
- From: Ret.
- Re: Darwin's law strikes again...
- From: Mike P
- Re: Darwin's law strikes again...
- From: Paul Hyett
- Re: Darwin's law strikes again...
- From: Mike P
- Re: Darwin's law strikes again...
- From: Ret.
- Re: Darwin's law strikes again...
- From: Theodore
- Re: Darwin's law strikes again...
- From: Joe Lee
- Re: Darwin's law strikes again...
- From: ian field
- Re: Darwin's law strikes again...
- From: Mike P
- Re: Darwin's law strikes again...
- From: Brimstone
- Re: Darwin's law strikes again...
- From: Mike P
- Re: Darwin's law strikes again...
- From: Maria
- Re: Darwin's law strikes again...
- From: joe
- Re: Darwin's law strikes again...
- From: bod
- Re: Darwin's law strikes again...
- From: Mike P
- Re: Darwin's law strikes again...
- From: Ret.
- Re: Darwin's law strikes again...
- From: Mike P
- Re: Darwin's law strikes again...
- From: bod
- Re: Darwin's law strikes again...
- From: Mike P
- Darwin's law strikes again...
- Prev by Date: Re: Darwin's law strikes again...
- Next by Date: Re: Darwin's law strikes again...
- Previous by thread: Re: Darwin's law strikes again...
- Next by thread: Re: Darwin's law strikes again...
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|