Re: Gill Langley, come out from under the bed and debate me before the end comes, you filthy coward

The following is extracted from pages 9 to 11 of "Imperatrice Nuda/
Slaughter of the Innocent" by Hans Ruesch, 1976:



============================================================



"The Great Drug Deception" by Dr Ralph Adam Fine (Stein and Day, New
York, 1972) is just one of the many books published in the last decade
on the subject of dangerous and often lethal drugs, but it achieved no
practical results. Health authorities, as well as the public,
stubbornly refused to take cognizance of the fact that all those drugs
had been okayed and marketed after having been proved safe for
animals. Actually it is unfair to single out just a few dangerous
drugs, since there are thousands of them.


Of course the fallacy works both ways, precluding the acceptance of
useful drugs.



There is the great example of penicillin - if we want to consider this
a useful drug.

Its discoverers said they were fortunate. No guinea pigs were
available for the toxicity tests, so they used mice instead.


Penicillin kills guinea pigs.



But the same guinea pigs can safely eat strychnine,

one of the deadliest poisons for humans

- but not for monkeys.



Certain wild berries are deadly for human beings,

but birds thrive on them.



A dose of belladona that would kill a man

is harmless for rabbits and goats.



Calomelan doesn't influence the secretion of bile in dogs,

but can treble it in man.




The use of digitalis - the main remedy for cardiac patients and the
saviour of countless lives the world over -

was retarded for a long time because it was first tested on dogs,

in which it dangerously raises blood pressure.



And chloroform is so toxic to dogs that for many years this valuable
anesthetic was
not employed on patients.



On the other hand a dose of opium that would kill a man

is harmless to dogs and chickens.




Datura and henbane are poison for man,

but food for the snail.




The mushroom *amanita phalloides*, a small dose of which can wipe out
a whole human family,

is consumed without ill effects by the rabbit, one of the most common
laboratory animals.



A porcupine can eat in one lump without discomfort as much opium as a
human addict smokes in two weeks, and wash it down with enough prussic
acid to poison a regiment of soldiers.


The sheep can swallow enormous quantities of arsenic,

once the murderers' favourite poison.


Potassium cyanide, deadly for us,

is harmless for the owl,



but one of our common field pumpkins can put a horse into a serious
state of agitation.



Morphine, which calms and anesthetizes man,
causes maniacal excitement in cats and mice,

but dogs can stand doses up to 20 times higher than man.



On the other hand, our sweet almonds can kill foxes and chickens,



and our common parsley is poison to parrots...........




There are enough such instances to fill a book - all proving that it
would be difficult to find a more absurd and less scientific method of
medical research (than animal experimentation).


Moreover, the anguish and sufferings of the animals, deprived of their
natural habitat or habitual surroundings, terrorized by what they see
in the laboratories and the brutalities they are subjected to, alter
their mental balance and organic reactions to such an extent that ANY
result is a priori
valueless.



The laboratory animal is a monster, made so by the experimenters.
Physically and mentally it has very little in common with a normal
animal, and much less with man.


As even Claude Bernard (1813-1878), founder of the modern
vivisectionist method, wrote in his Physiologie Operatoire (page
152):

"The experimental animal is never in a normal state. The normal state
is merely a supposition, an assumption."


.......................
.......................


Somebody launched the idea of breeding strains of bacteriologically
sterile laboratory animals...................


One delusion spawned another. Consistent failure made certain of those
misguided scientists realize - some haven't realized it yet - that
organic "material" raised under such abnormal conditions differs more
than ever from normal organisms.
Animals so raised never develop the natural defence mechanism, the so-
called immunological reaction, which is a salient characteristic of
every living organism. So it would be difficult to devise a less
reliable experimental material.
Besides, animals are by nature immune to most human infections -
diphtheria, thyphus, scarlet fever, German measles, smallpox, cholera,
yellow fever, leprosy and bubonic plague - while other infections,
such as TB and various septicemias, take up different forms in
animals. So the claim that through animals we can learn to control
human diseases could seem a sign of madness if we didn't know that it
is just a pretext for carrying on "experiments" which, however
dangerously misleading for medical science, are either intimately
satisfying for those who execute them, or highly lucrative.


The Swiss nation illustrates well to what extent the profit motive
promotes vivisection: with a population of less than 6 million,
Switzerland uses up annually many times as many laboratory animals as
does all of Soviet Russia with its 250 million inhabitants, but where
there is no money in the making of medicines.


------------------------------------------------------------------------


-End of extract from IMPERATRICE NUDA / "Slaughter of the Innocent" by
Hans Ruesch, pages 9-11, dated 1976.


------------------------------------------------------------------------



Addendum:

HUMANITY'S SUICIDE PACT

---------------------------------------------------

The entire human species, all six billion of us, are members of an
extreme, fanatical "doomsday cult" now acting out our slow-motion
suicide pact, taking our children and our grandchildren with us.

The FAKE DEBATE on vivisection is one of the more prominent symptoms
of the extreme severity of the COLLECTIVE MENTAL ILLNESS afflicting
all six billion human beings.

If you consider the information in the document "ANIMAL
EXPERIMENTATION: THE HIDDEN CAUSE OF ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION," notice
that as you are reading it, you know that every word there is true.
Next, notice that you do not register that knowledge in your memory,
but instead you return to the FAKE DEBATE which shuts out the truth
and gives us the illusion of discussion on the vivisection swindle and
the slow-motion suicide of the entire human species that is the
vivisection swindle, while never actually discussing the slow-motion
suicide of the entire human species that is the vivisection swindle.

Even the guy who authored that document, the guy with a Dutch-
sounding name, notice how very severely mentally ill even he is too.
He states that knowledge of the slow-motion suicide of the entire
human species via fake "animal tests" (=non-tests), and then the
"solution" he has to offer is only to "do your best to avoid poisons."
In other words, that bloody fool is advising you to just commit
suicide and to kill your children and your grandchildren in the same
suicide pact, but just a little bit more slowly !
Other people, such as the managers of the "Hans Ruesch Centre" website
and similar, are also displaying the severity of their mental illness
in the same way, by stating that knowledge of the slow-motion suicide
of the entire human species while NOT proposing the only *non-mentally-
ill* response.

Any person who is NOT suffering from mental illness will state the
obvious solution: co-ordinated worldwide *citizens arrests* of all
known vivisectors and also of all known peddlers of the fake debate
that conceals the truth, all these people to be marched to the nearest
police station and handed to the police to be tried for manslaughter /
genocide, with the possibility of a lenient sentence if they offer the
defence of mental impairment.

That *non-mentally-ill* approach to our *universal suicide pact* was
given in Tom's article of June 1990 (link below), and has been
universally ignored ever since, thus demonstrating that all members of
the human species are VERY SEVERELY MENTALLY ILL, but none are more
mentally ill and none are more irresponsible than those fakers who
claim to be the heirs of Hans Ruesch. It is important to understand
that the Hans Ruesch Centre, NZAVS and similar are part of that same
FAKE DEBATE.

Any person who does NOT endorse what is said here and does NOT promote
the ideas in Tom's article of June 1990 as the only way forward - is
part of that same FAKE DEBATE and is advertising himself/herself AS
VERY SEVERELY MENTALLY ILL and is in a suicide pact with his/her
children and grandchildren.

The FAKE DEBATE on vivisection is your only REAL lesson in human
psychology. You will not learn anything of importance about human
psychology by tormenting rats in a university and learning a lot of
obfuscating jargon to befuddle your brain even further.
You will learn the truth about human psychology by - for a start -
reading at the links below, and then observing the fact that while you
know it's all true, you will NOT register that knowledge in your brain
and you are NOT going to take the only *non-mentally-ill* action to
stop the collective suicide of the entire human species, the only *non-
mentally-ill* action being the one proposed in June 1990 and
universally ignored ever since and for all future time by this
severely mentally ill species called humanity.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The Biggest Taboo, the Only *Non-mentally-ill* Response to the
Vivisection Swindle, June 1990:
http://www.nzavs.org.nz/mobilise/27/12.html

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Return to main articles list:
http://docs.google.com/View?docid=dddp6bt4_829zpt8ffd
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Hi Doug
    ... about bird flu is not that it can be transfered to a few humans working ... If the drugs are OK on animals then why not on humans? ... Herceptin is a massively increased risk of heart failure. ...
    (uk.transport)
  • Re: Hi Doug
    ... medical drugs passed safe on animals. ... Herceptin is a massively increased risk of heart failure. ...
    (uk.transport)
  • Re: Where is the evidence that animal research benefits humans?
    ... But it's not fair to count his death as ... >>need to do to test drugs. ... These rights don't exist for animals. ... > utilitarian principle underlying medical research, ...
    (sci.med)
  • Re: Future evolution of man
    ... >> and putative free will is still, ... "self-awareness" should be ... > Non-human animals may be made self-aware in a limited way, ... experiments with drugs where attempts are made to classify ...
    (sci.bio.evolution)
  • Re: Hi Doug
    ... research before testing on humans or the drug is simply not developed ... medical drugs passed safe on animals. ... Herceptin is a massively increased risk of heart failure. ...
    (uk.transport)