Re: Government Perjury
- From: peterwn <peterwn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2009 17:02:26 -0700 (PDT)
On Oct 30, 8:57 am, "charlesweh...@xxxxxxxxxxx"
<charlesweh...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
This is an official document of the European Court of Human Rights. InThis is an assertion or statement of opinion, not a statement of fact.
it, Lord Justice Morritt, an official of the British government tells
a lie.
It is an OFFICIAL LIE - one of many. In Paragraph 17, he says that
Britain is not bound Human Rights - a blanket dismissal - in the hope
that Britain might be deemed justified in breaking one of them -
Article 6.
So even if you believe it is not true, it is not a lie for purposes of
perjury. If it is considered wrong, the appropriate course of action
is to appeal with cogent arguments why it is.
Whether Britain is bound by specific 'human rights' is a matter of
interpretation of British, EU and International law. International law
is very persuasive but not binding except with respect to treaties
Britain has signed.
.
- References:
- Government Perjury
- From: charleswehner@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Government Perjury
- Prev by Date: Re: 'Child protection' makes criminals of us all ... We are all Pre-Criminals Phil
- Next by Date: Re: Ryanair 1p flights, are they what they say they are?
- Previous by thread: Re: Government Perjury
- Next by thread: Re: Government Perjury
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
