Re: Justifiable killing?

Firtly, some fundamentals ...

(1) I have no interest what a troll (in fact, anyone who is
destructive, for little or no good reason) believes about me or my
posts, only that the poster be exposed for what they are, for the
benefit of the group and outside of it.

(2) A belief/opinion/proposed scenario etc is not a fact, nor is it
the truth (as news report rarely are).

[You first of all defend a criminal while berating a man who was
defending hiself against that criminal.]

I respect your belief. All involved appear to be criminals, at this
time. I defended only what the law states, however, I may defend the
actions of who I wish.

[Then you twist the facts as they are presented.]

I drew upon, around, 8 reports, at the time and proposed a scenario -
see (2)

[Then you invent facts that were not reported.]

See above.

[Then you deny other facts that were reported.]

Please show me where I did this.

[Then you try to manipulate perceptions by associating mental images
with
race.]

What about the actors do I have incorrect?

[Then you infer that sexual assault would be acceptable.]

I refer you to my earlier response.on that issue.

[Then you suggest that people can somehow overcome their flight or
fight
instincts.]

We do so, every time we meet another person/potentially-dangerous
situation, often even when we do not.

Now, if you are referring to panic etc, that is another issue.

[Then you resort to schoolyard insults.]

I refer you to my earlier response.and offer on that issue.

[Then you try to get into a contest of who has the biggest
credentials.]

You introduced the issue of credibility.

[Then you claim that age is inextricably linked with knowledge.]

Yes

For 10000 people, plot a graph of age (0-90) versus acquired knowledge
and see what trend you observe.

Now, individuals will fall above and below the curve, but the
correlation will be significant, if not high. I will be above the
line, I cannot speak for you.

[And finally, you try to back out by saying your interest is
dwindling.]

An actual statement of fact, as you are little challenge in logical
debate. My effort is directly proportional to the challenge offered.

[All the while you display a spectacular inability to see and
understand
the bigger picture.
Have I missed anything there?]

Yes, what do you mean by The Bigger Picture?

I look forward to your reply, please abide by the agreed rules.

WM
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: How Often Do Americans Use Guns for Defensive Purposes
    ... They are breaking the law. ... >>* I report ALL CRIMINAL activities I am aware of. ... > crime is being committed. ... preferring, instead, to allow criminals to roam the streets at will. ...
    (talk.politics.guns)
  • Re: How Often Do Americans Use Guns for Defensive Purposes
    ... So you report all speeders then, since you have stated that you report ... >>>preferring, instead, to allow criminals to roam the streets at will. ... >>>reporting crimes. ... >**I've explained, several times, that I report ALL CRIMINAL offences I am ...
    (talk.politics.guns)
  • Re: "Fair (hah) and Balanced (giggle)"
    ... and property against criminals then there should be ... We have the right to defend ourselves and our property, ... http://www.jim.com/ James A. Donald ...
    (rec.arts.sf.fandom)
  • Re: US Grand Prix to Return in 2012 in Austin, TX
    ... We don't normally shoot tourists if they behave themselves. ... where good citizens have used a firearm to defend themselves or their loved ones against criminals intent on harming them. ...
    (rec.autos.sport.f1)
  • Re: How Often Do Americans Use Guns for Defensive Purposes
    ... >> So you report all speeders then, since you have stated that you report ... >> criminals. ... >> law and should be reported, ... >> AA DGU may not involve a crime. ...
    (talk.politics.guns)