Re: Glitter banned from taking foreign holiday


"Nigel Oldfield" <wmcriticalestoppel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:4480e68a-b7a7-4e13-b725-8ad426e44bc6@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
" "I am satisfied from Dr Sullivan's evidence that the risk of sexual
offences against children would increase if he was permitted to travel
overseas."

Given his track record that is true. Do you dispute the evidence?


.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Glitter banned from taking foreign holiday
    ... Given his track record that is true. ...  Do you dispute the evidence? ...
    (uk.legal)
  • Re: Impeccable
    ... >>> sociobiology. ... > Typical anthropologists. ... believe it is consistent with all of the evidence. ... That's a dispute. ...
    (sci.anthropology.paleo)
  • Re: Conventional Evasiveness
    ... I wonder how many of the 9 specific direct questions that I put to Jim ... Why does is matter if you don't dispute it. ... interpretation of the evidence. ... So do you consider the change from Pan / Australopith LCA to A'pith to ...
    (sci.anthropology.paleo)
  • Re: The Depths of Jims Genius
    ... >>> The answer is that you can't dispute it. ... For those of you playing at home, what we see here is evidence of one ... you may divine as the discussion proceeds that Jim does ... McGinnian technique for fact avoidance. ...
    (sci.anthropology.paleo)
  • Re: Savanna nonsense
    ... > Jim McGinn wrote: ... >> fossil record upwards of 7 million years ago. ... Anybody that looks at the evidence and concludes ... > You don't provide enough to dispute, ...
    (sci.anthropology.paleo)
Loading