Re: Will this be a no-fault claim?
- From: Prai Jei <pvstownsend.zyx.abc@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 19 Sep 2009 12:30:34 +0100
Ian Jackson set the following eddies spiralling through the space-time
continuum:
In message
<ebb23bb0-55e8-4693-83a8-959a31a2606a@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Ste
<ste_rose0@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes
Unless the inner lanes are congested it would seem good practice to
move to the middle or inner
I think 'outer' was intended here.
lane
when approaching a trailing slip
road, not the other way round.
By what logic?
I sense the start of another "Why the hell should I?" argument!
Considerate drivers, who 'read the road' and drive in a manner which
maximises the smooth traffic flow, naturally try to move from Lane 1 to
Lane 2 in order to allow sliproad traffic to merge with the main
carriageway. But there many who argue "Why the hell should I?"
It's a point of courtesy. I do it whenever traffic conditions permit. See my
opinions on the incident upthread.
--
ξ:) Proud to be curly
Interchange the alphabetic letter groups to reply
.
- References:
- Will this be a no-fault claim?
- From: jon
- Re: Will this be a no-fault claim?
- From: Ste
- Re: Will this be a no-fault claim?
- From: peterwn
- Re: Will this be a no-fault claim?
- From: Ste
- Re: Will this be a no-fault claim?
- From: Ian Jackson
- Will this be a no-fault claim?
- Prev by Date: Re: Will this be a no-fault claim?
- Next by Date: Re: Lewis Carroll
- Previous by thread: Re: Will this be a no-fault claim?
- Next by thread: Re: Will this be a no-fault claim?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|