Re: Seldom seen a better argument for firearms
- From: Nigel Oldfield <wmcriticalestoppel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2009 09:39:35 -0700 (PDT)
On Aug 13, 11:56 am, November 5 <november.fifth...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
Sam wrote:
"November 5" <november.fifth...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:3354edc2-3bdf-420d-ad9f-397aa64f5dc7@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sam wrote:
"Mike Ross" <m...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:5tv685d0ddgkn45ogniep17sselfqfeidd@xxxxxxxxxx
On Wed, 12 Aug 2009 19:01:38 -0700 (PDT), Nigel Oldfield
<wmcriticalestop...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Aug 13, 2:34 am, Mike Ross <m...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/england/cambridgeshire/8198352..stm
"The Chief Constable of Cambridgeshire has apologised after officers
took four
hours to respond to a call from two nurses being threatened by
intruders.
Julie Spence said there was "no excuse" for the poor handling of the
incident.
Amy Overend and a friend made an emergency call to police after four
men
came
into their building threatening them with violence and rape.
The nurses, who are flatmates, locked themselves inside their
hospital
accommodation in Peterborough."
If that was my daughter, she would be going back to said hospital
accomodation
with a Glock.
What, to counteract the Uzis/Desert Eagles of the 4 men?
Who mentioned the men being armed? What's your point? When threated
with
rape
and violence, a firearm is a good option for defence!
Funny how it's always the people who have never had to use a firearm on a
professional basis who always think that way.
The real criminal here is the Hollywood film industry for brainwashing
people into thinking that guns make you invincible.
Moron. More people in films die holding guns than those without. So
your argument fails.
How do they die?
At the hands of a person holding another gun you moron.
Yes, and herein lies the lesson for you that all is fair in natural
selection.
If the person was unjustly killed (e.g. a cop by criminals) then his
slow reflexes will not be in the gene pool any more.
If the person was justly killed (e.g. a criminal by cops) then their
genes predisposing them to criminal activity won't be in the gene pool
any more.
The simple fact is, you put a firearm into the hands of an untrained person
A damn sight better than disarming a person and throwing them into a
den of wolves. People like you, utterly oblivious in your moral high
horses of meddling, are guilty when unarmed, defenceless folk get
slaughtered by weapon-wielding criminals.
YOU took the guns away from them with which they could have defended
themselves.
and expect them to shoot another human being, chances are they're going to
panic and either drop the gun, shoot themselves, or else create a bloodbath
as all manner of innocent people get caught up in the incident.
That's if the weapon doesn't get taken forcibly from them and used against
them.
Natural selection is quite bloody, but ultimately for the species'
good.
But why take the word of someone who actually knows what he's talking about?
You obviously know far better from watching your Bruce Willis films.
LOL yeah, I'm watching Die Hard today. How did you guess?
N5
Do you not understand, that we do not only operate by Natural
Selection?
WM
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Seldom seen a better argument for firearms
- From: November 5
- Re: Seldom seen a better argument for firearms
- References:
- Seldom seen a better argument for firearms
- From: Mike Ross
- Re: Seldom seen a better argument for firearms
- From: Nigel Oldfield
- Re: Seldom seen a better argument for firearms
- From: Mike Ross
- Re: Seldom seen a better argument for firearms
- From: Sam
- Re: Seldom seen a better argument for firearms
- From: November 5
- Re: Seldom seen a better argument for firearms
- From: Sam
- Re: Seldom seen a better argument for firearms
- From: November 5
- Seldom seen a better argument for firearms
- Prev by Date: Re: If you are accused of exceeding the speed limit
- Next by Date: Re: Radio at work
- Previous by thread: Re: Seldom seen a better argument for firearms
- Next by thread: Re: Seldom seen a better argument for firearms
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading