Re: Why no Flame Throwers
- From: Keith2.0 <thelyricalterrapin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2009 19:14:10 +0100
On Sat, 11 Jul 2009 07:49:57 +0100, "Smolley" <jon_1940@xxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
"nightjar .me.uk>" <cpb@<insert my surname here> wrote in message
news:hY2dnaSqiMS4U8rXnZ2dnUVZ8mydnZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
"AndyW" <Andrew.whitelaw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:4a56e1aa$1_1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
...
I have a radical idea on how to win the war on terror. It's very simple
you just count the cost of all the weapons, bombs, planes, vehicles and
lives and then invade the country with massive aid....
which the men with guns take and use to buy more guns.
Colin Bignell
You could also apply that principle to crime, pay the muggers and burlars
not to commit any crimes.
Already tried, its called the police service.
Propably cheaper in the long run, but it would put.
a lot of people out of work.
- References:
- Why no Flame Throwers
- From: Smolley
- Re: Why no Flame Throwers
- From: AndyW
- Re: Why no Flame Throwers
- From: nightjar
- Re: Why no Flame Throwers
- From: Smolley
- Why no Flame Throwers
- Prev by Date: Re: Share of freehold / leasehold flat no animal clause
- Next by Date: Re: Parked car
- Previous by thread: Re: Why no Flame Throwers
- Next by thread: Re: Why no Flame Throwers
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|