The ticking clock
- From: Webmanager_CritEst <webmanager@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 28 Jun 2009 10:35:46 -0700 (PDT)
The ticking clock
Extracts from relevant previous comments from the Director General of
the National Crime Squad, Bill Hughes
"Whoever has been leaking is hugely irresponsible. It undermines us
all if people think we're celebrity-bashing. I haven't seen any MPs on
the list. Some of it is spiteful. People ring us up to say they know
that Cabinet ministers are involved. It's untrue. But the crime is
committed across a huge spectrum.
"These sites can be horrendous. The Operation Ore sites showed newborn
babies being brutalised; toddlers were penetrated, children were
forced into the most obscene positions. All this to the most haunting
soundtracks, and over the music, you could hear the children's
screams. It was blood-curdling." The interviewing journalist added,
“The squad is now having to put sound-proofing in the rooms where they
viewed the material.” And about some journalists in Canada shown the
sites: “Several are still receiving counselling.”
The Operation Ore action team researchers who obtained the Landslide
records found little evidence to support the above.
Invitation
It is important that the worst of the other public statements that
contributed to the creation of the monstrous travesty of Operation Ore
now be recorded and published. Please, and especially if you were
damaged by Ore, send them to this editor now.
The protected names or ‘Jumping Jacks’
Apart from the predominant deceit of what the Landslide database
actually contained, there is the subsidiary ticking time bomb that has
come to be known as 'the protected names' or ‘Jumping Jacks’. It was
rumoured from the beginning of Operation Ore that there were names of
individuals in high places on the Landslide subscriber data base, not
proceeded against by the police and prosecution service, which, at the
same time, ruined thousands of other British families who were not so
protected.
The police are on record denying that such names existed, but since
the daring ‘raid’ on the US by the Operation Ore class action team in
late 2006, which secured both the Landslide subscriber database and
the FBI Landslide prosecution files, never before shown to the
defence, the action team members could tell if such names really
existed.
The great predicament for even the most honourable of the individuals
thus protected is that such protection may have compromised them and
made them the ‘Jumping Jacks’ of the police. Examples are senior
public servants and politicians in a position to increase police
powers and key journalists and broadcasters who are now reluctant to
publish the truth about Operation Ore - indeed, who possibly dare not.
There appears to be no reason at this stage why any such names would
be revealed in the group action, which is concerned only with those
claiming wrongful arrest and prosecution, but it takes little stretch
of the imagination to predict that the fall out from the group action
could bring public pressure for any so-called protected names to be
revealed and assurances given that no favours were exchanged for that
protection.
What would be very interesting to know is how many of the protected
names were informed by the police that their names were on the list,
although there is no point in trying to guess at what further
conversation took place about the matter.
Given that credit card fraud is now widely accepted as a reason for
being on the Landslide subscriber database, any individual who knows
that he was protected thus would be wise to announce it now before
some later forced disclosure. The Editor would be happy to assist in
the process of that revelation.
Current events
Perhaps the strangest, and certainly unexpected, development in the
saga was the recent Chief Constable Colin Port versus Jim Bates
controversy. Certain aspects of it were understandable and even
predictable, such as the raid and second arrest of Jim Bates, as this
gave the police access to the (supposedly privileged) papers of the
coming group action, which they must have badly wanted to see so as
not to be at any disadvantage.
But why having managed to seize the group action files did Port go on
to defy a High Court order that he return all the seized material to
Bates? Jim Gamble's public support of Port in the matter, including
the latter's claim that he would risk jail rather than comply with the
order, suggests that the former could if he chose now also have access
to material of crucial importance to him.
But why did Port go out on a public limb from which he had to make a
humiliating day before court climb-down? After some further research,
that information may be forthcoming.
The following is in code
Information from an inside source suggests that names are being
selected for drop overboard from a listing boat.
Created on 06/28/2009 09:16 AM by Editor
Updated on 06/28/2009 01:57 PM by Editor
http://www.inquisition21.com/index.php?module=pagemaster&PAGE_user_op=view_page&PAGE_id=51
**
WM
www.critest.com
.
- Prev by Date: Re: Epidemic of self-harm sweeps women's jails.
- Next by Date: Re: Brighton residents face ID checks in their homes in run up to the Labour party conference.
- Previous by thread: Good lawyer required
- Next by thread: Join the One World Group
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
