Re: Can I demand a part refund?
- From: George <george@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 18:54:31 +0000
Peter Spikings wrote:
On Mar 24, 3:13 pm, Peter Parry <pe...@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:On Tue, 24 Mar 2009 07:05:38 -0700 (PDT), Peter Spikings
<pe...@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:On Mar 24, 1:35 pm, Peter Parry <pe...@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:You ordered a second hand unit and bulb, they didn't have one andIt might be clear to you, it isn't quite so obvious based on what youWell let's put it this way: I asked for unit + bulb, they quoted for
have said so far.
unit + bulb, I accepted said quote and paid in full, they supplied
unit without bulb.
offered a new replacement at the same price. Whether the terms were
the same is obviously a matter of dispute between you and the
supplier.
OK, they didn't tell me that the terms had changed so surely they
didn't change? What they said was that they were sourcing me a new
unit as they didn't have any in stock, absolutely no mention of the
bulb was made at any point before delivery except when I initially
asked for the quote.
I would have thought I could demand that they either complete theYour (only) immediate legal right is to cancel the contract. In
contract or provide suitable remuneration for failing to do so. So the
law says then that if you order two of something and only receive one
your only options are to return for refund or accept it if the seller
won't refund the difference in cost?
practice you can often renegotiate the terms but you are not bound to
and the other party can decline to offer different terms.
Fair enough, I'm declining their new terms of not providing me a
bulb :)
I see what you're saying about oen side not being able to change the
contract without the consent of the other but isn't it them that's
trying to change the contract?
If you had returned it under the DSR's then usually you would have toNo, they could now refuse to take it back as by using it you haveWell, OK. I'd have that battle then if I had immediately tried to
accepted the goods.
return it. Been through that quite a few times.
pay the return postage but the supplier would have to reimburse your
initial purchase price including outward postage.
This is a bug bear of mine.... Under the DSR's when the customer
cancels the supplier is always liable for the outbound postage.
Liability for the return postage is with the customer if he decides he
doesn't want it anymore but with the supplier if the item(s) are
faulty or incorrectly supplied (as would be in this case). However I
often have to fight to get them to pay for the return postage!
You've been on here all day moaning about a 3 quid bulb. Have you really got nothing better to do?
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Can I demand a part refund?
- From: Peter Spikings
- Re: Can I demand a part refund?
- From: Richard Bird
- Re: Can I demand a part refund?
- References:
- Can I demand a part refund?
- From: peter
- Re: Can I demand a part refund?
- From: Peter Parry
- Re: Can I demand a part refund?
- From: Peter Spikings
- Re: Can I demand a part refund?
- From: Peter Parry
- Re: Can I demand a part refund?
- From: Peter Spikings
- Can I demand a part refund?
- Prev by Date: Re: Speeding cop jailed
- Next by Date: Re: Ludicrous delays in the justice system
- Previous by thread: Re: Can I demand a part refund?
- Next by thread: Re: Can I demand a part refund?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading