Re: Davenport Lyons - Watchdog Report
- From: "steve robinson" <steve@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 10:44:13 GMT
Mike Harrison wrote:
On Sun, 25 Jan 2009 12:47:35 -0500, "Anthony R. Gold"
<not-for-mail@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Sun, 25 Jan 2009 15:48:40 +0000, Stephen Wolstenholme
<steve@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
The bit about tracking uploads from the IP address is nonsense. I
think someone is conning DL into paying for a service that would not
work unless every Internet user was on a static address.
It works when done in conjunction with information from the ISP on which
subscriber had the lease to that IP address on that date and at that time.
Tony
As long as someone hasn't cloned their cable modem MAC.
Or used an open wireless connection.
or used an ip scrambling programme or infected the machine with a virus the
list is endless
DL are just relying on the fact people will roll over and pay because they may
have visited other sites that they may not want others to know about
DL have not won any case yet that has been defended in the uk
They also forget that in many homes thier are several computers and 'toys' that
can connect to the net through a router , the isp ip will only log the modem it
will not log the computers attached
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Davenport Lyons - Watchdog Report
- From: Norman Wells
- Re: Davenport Lyons - Watchdog Report
- References:
- Davenport Lyons - Watchdog Report
- From: The Todal
- Re: Davenport Lyons - Watchdog Report
- From: Stephen Wolstenholme
- Re: Davenport Lyons - Watchdog Report
- From: Mike Harrison
- Davenport Lyons - Watchdog Report
- Prev by Date: Re: Davenport Lyons - Watchdog Report
- Next by Date: Re: Property boundary encroachment
- Previous by thread: Re: Davenport Lyons - Watchdog Report
- Next by thread: Re: Davenport Lyons - Watchdog Report
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|