Re: California officer kills man by mistake

Ret. wrote:
Kim Bolton wrote:

Then they and their controllers should be facing murder charges, if
only to test their 'belief'.

Where is the 'malice aforethought'?

The intent to kill or cause serious injury.

--
Mike

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: California officer kills man by mistake
    ... The intent to kill or cause serious injury. ... That is not with malice - there has to be a 'guilty mind'. ... to do so cannot constitute malice aforethought. ...
    (uk.legal)
  • Re: 4 May 1970
    ... assumes: intent and malice. ... human being with malice aforethought." ... The legal term "malice" has a definition that's quite different from ... And intent to kill is not a necessary ...
    (rec.arts.sf.fandom)
  • Re: JOIN THE NRA !!
    ... are designed to kill and maim human beings. ... I will simply note that an AW shares the same design as any other gun. ... but AW are not designed with the intent of being lethal weapons. ...
    (talk.politics.guns)
  • Re: JOIN THE NRA !!
    ... are designed to kill and maim human beings. ... kills more people by accident than do guns when used with lethal intent. ...
    (talk.politics.guns)
  • Re: PL all but concedes US embargo is genocide -- Whatever it takes!!!
    ... The intent to kill is obvious. ... Cuba is in a cash crisis and can't pay for imports. ...
    (soc.culture.cuba)
Loading