Re: Crazy Woman
- From: "Janitor of Lunacy" <ghost@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 14 Sep 2008 00:26:17 +0100
Glenallan wrote:
Grampa
Even if she is paying solicitors they have a duty to act in the best
interests of their client. She may be mentally ill (and sectionable
in the Mental Health Act 1959) or merely mentally incapable (in
which case her relatives or Social Services might take action see
http://www.publicguardian.gov.uk/docs/Mental-Capacity-Act-2005.pdf).
You could write to them categorically denying all her allegations and
recommending that they take action to protect their client from her
own litigiousness.
This sounds like a good ploy.
Also..there is a bus shelter near me.
Suppose I were to post her letters unaltered on the shelter for public
viewing,
given that I do not actually give a shit, and she probably does.
Can she prevent this.??
Or...suppose I post them on the outer 'street facing wall' of my
garage.!!
I ntend that she be well and truly Phukked.!!
Grampa.
----------
Problem is you want her to be dealt with, not yourself, and you might find
that if you publish her letters in this way, she might suddenly find enough
sanity to raise a complaint of harassment, and you're "Phukked". You
probably wouldn't be charged, but you might be warned informally, and
myself, I'd prefer to live without that hassle. You might even be warned
formally under PHA and that piece of paper would be lodged at your local
police station for quite a long time.
.
- References:
- Crazy Woman
- From: Grampabob
- Re: Crazy Woman
- From: R. Mark Clayton
- Re: Crazy Woman
- From: Glenallan
- Crazy Woman
- Prev by Date: Re: Gordon - has he been CRB checked?
- Next by Date: Re: Crazy Woman
- Previous by thread: Re: Crazy Woman
- Next by thread: Re: Crazy Woman
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|