Re: Something and nothing
- From: Oscar Fister <wittenburg@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 31 Aug 2008 04:30:58 -0500
On Sat, 30 Aug 2008 15:11:40 -0700, lepa_1972 wrote:
Evening all,
I overhead a conversation in a pub this afternoon that disturbed me.
Basically, someone I know by sight, but not personally, I shall call him
Mr X, claimed in a conversation to a Mr Y, to have had "back door"
access via a hack from an IT savvy mate to a Russian pay per view
website that featured women and children being raped on demand. He
claimed that he merely got into the site, did not view anything illegal,
and then informed "the Home Office" by anonymous e-mail, about what he
had found.
Now if all that he has said is true, then I guess he has not committed
an offence. At the same time, if what he has said is true, and somehow
I doubt it, then I believe this website should be checked out.
I plan to call the police tomorrow and pass on this information. My
question is: can I do this without Mr X discovering who dobbed him in?
If he is telling the truth, then of course he has nothing to fear. But
I would rather not be known as the individual who caused him to have his
computer seized for six months or more ...
Be very careful, you could be getting set up.
--
.
- Prev by Date: Re: Richard must be on Holiday
- Next by Date: Partnership
- Previous by thread: Re: Something and nothing
- Next by thread: Re: Richard must be on Holiday
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
