Re: P2P File sharing court win - but not for who you thought...
- From: Beef Curry <number42@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2008 16:54:19 +0100
nully wrote:
Norman Wells wrote:Norman Wells wrote:Another uncontested case from someone whos name makes me think probably didn't even understand the charge. Thats the best you can do?nully wrote:Ping Norm Wells - be interested on your take on this, Norm!!!
http://www.vnunet.com/vnunet/news/2224122/single-mum-wins-107-951-riaa
Perfectly right. No-one should be falsely accused of doing wrong
when they haven't.
But it doesn't set any precedent for those who are rightly accused.
PS. Ping Nully - be interested in your take on this, Null!!!
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/connected/main.jhtml?xml=/connected/2008/08/19/dlfile119.xml
It will all get turned over when HRA gets involved.
.
- References:
- P2P File sharing court win - but not for who you thought...
- From: nully
- Re: P2P File sharing court win - but not for who you thought...
- From: Norman Wells
- Re: P2P File sharing court win - but not for who you thought...
- From: Norman Wells
- Re: P2P File sharing court win - but not for who you thought...
- From: nully
- P2P File sharing court win - but not for who you thought...
- Prev by Date: Re:***wits Rule
- Next by Date: Re: Trial collapses after juror turns investigator
- Previous by thread: Re: P2P File sharing court win - but not for who you thought...
- Next by thread: Re: P2P File sharing court win - but not for who you thought...
- Index(es):