Re: Another Slap In The Face For Schools
- From: Alex Heney <me8@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 02 Aug 2008 00:18:33 +0100
On Fri, 1 Aug 2008 11:35:46 +0100, "Norman Wells" <norman@xxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
Alex Heney wrote:
On 31 Jul 2008 08:54:18 GMT, "joe" <joeparkinchinese@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
Alex Heney wrote:<snip>
None, except that those fighting the case has previously accepted
the rules then, somewhat disreputably in my view, changed their
mind.
There is not the slightest shadow of evidence in anything reported
that they ever accepted the rules.
They knew the rules when they applied to the school. If they didn't,
then they show no concern for their daughters welfare.
It is very doubtful they knew the interpretation of the rules that
would be used to exclude her for something they did not expect to
breach them.
Tell us then, oh all-knowing one, (a) just what you think the school
intended to exclude by their no jewellery rule, and (b) what they do
actually exclude according to you, with examples in each case.
How the hell would I know?
Why on earth do you think I am "all knowing"?
I realise I know a lot more than you about human beings, but so do
most people, and that does not make me (or most people) "all knowing".
--
Alex Heney, Global Villager
Go shopping. Buy Stuff. Sweat in it. Return it the next day.
To reply by email, my address is alexATheneyDOTplusDOTcom
.
- References:
- Re: Another Slap In The Face For Schools
- From: Alex Heney
- Re: Another Slap In The Face For Schools
- From: Norman Wells
- Re: Another Slap In The Face For Schools
- Prev by Date: Re: Another Slap In The Face For Schools
- Next by Date: Re: Another Slap In The Face For Schools
- Previous by thread: Re: Another Slap In The Face For Schools
- Next by thread: Re: Another Slap In The Face For Schools
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|