Re: Children as young as 12 seeking sex on the Internet
- From: Ishtar <ishtar.come@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 12:39:23 -0700 (PDT)
On 31 Jul, 19:36, Captain Squashy Feet <siz...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
<......>
===============http://docs.google.com/View?docid=dddp6bt4_829zpt8ffdYou seem to have an extremely unhealthy attachment to
your mothers anus. Have you seen a doctor?
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------You are saying that for an infant to be 'attached' to his mother's
anus is unhealthy.
Well the baby obviously has the wrong side of the mothers body and is
out by about 2 feet as well.
REPLY FROM THE UNIVERSAL INFANT:
The following are the crucial paragraphs from "Silence of the Damned"
-
============================================================
begin extracts from "Silence of the Damned:"
-------
"The infant’s innate sense of natural justice is outraged by the slow
realisation that his mother has effectively raped him: the mother
spends months deriving sexual pleasure from pawing and ogling every
part of her baby’s body and from using her baby as a human sex toy or
vibrator to stimulate the mother’s nipples, which - according to the
women I have known - unavoidably leads to sexual arousal and
engorgement of the mother’s clitoris. (The exception to this is when
the mother has been so badly repressed by her own upbringing - read
downbringing - that her body refuses to respond to nipple stimulation
as Nature intended.) The infant’s love for the mother is boundless and
intensely focused. To refuse the infant the opportunity to return the
mother’s delightfully pleasurable caresses, exactly as given, to
refuse the infant any physical outlet for such an intense emotion of
boundless love - is a hideously cruel regime of systematic child abuse
practised by every mother in our sick and tragic civilisation for the
past eleven thousand years. If you are a mother in the present
civilisation, you are - by definition - a child abuser, because the
immediate unconscious goal of motherhood is to generate soldiers, and
only child abuse can generate soldiers. This is going on because of
the present regime of insanity which was imposed on us in the chaos of
an ancient survivalist emergency, and never changed after the
vegetation grew back.
In my adult life, I had a friendship with a woman who inundated me
with acts of kindness and generosity. Whenever I offered to give a
little kindness back to her, she made rejecting remarks, often
refusing outright to allow me to return her love. I felt abused and
defrauded by this woman. She was using me to indulge a need she had to
give love and kindness to a man. She did not care about my natural
response of needing to ‘return the favour’ in some way, a universal
emotion common to all sane life forms. I had to get away from that
woman, who was showering me with her love, and refusing to allow me to
love her back. She hurt me badly, not just because she was abusing me
by giving me her love and refusing to allow me to love her back, but
most of all because her behaviour resonated with and reproduced one of
the most heartbreaking features of the mother-infant relationship in
its present degraded form. Every mother’s refusal to allow her baby to
return the mother’s loving caresses exactly as given - this is a
hideously cruel regime of child abuse practised by every mother in the
present tragic civilisation in which the purpose of motherhood is to
generate hate-crazed, amnesiac soldiers to do the Bush Gang’s killing
for them. The imbalance of the mother’s topsy-turvy, upside down, stop-
go-yes-no relationship with her infant becomes one of the powerful
IMPRINTS contaminating our civilisation and playing hell with all our
adult relationships - personal, societal, economic, international. And
as an inevitable side effect of generating soldiers, the mother-infant
relationship also generates criminals, psychopaths and emotional
cripples - depending on each individual permutation of the several
forms of child abuse inherent in the mother-infant relationship in its
present degraded form.
=====================================
If the mother-infant relationship is going to impose on our brains
these IMPRINTS which have to repeat themselves in disguised forms in
our adult lives, then isn’t it time we got around to making infancy in
this civilisation a PLEASANT, SANE experience, instead of the
UNPLEASANT, INSANE experience our infancy is under current societal
arrangements?
=====================================
As I said from the start, in all versions of “The Voice of the
Voiceless” - I support the current paedophile-hunting frenzy, and
serious or persistent child abusers should be locked up for life. But
then the book goes on to say - with perfect and unassailable logic:
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
“I SEE SOMETHING INCONGRUOUS ABOUT JAILING PAEDOPHILES WHILE AT THE
SAME TIME ALLOWING OUR MOTHERS TO CONTINUE TO WALK THE STREETS.”
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yes, I know it takes time to get your brains around this. But it’s the
only path to genuine healing. We’ll never heal unless we face this.
Read the following paragraph once again (or twenty more times if you
need to):
----------------------------------
The infant’s innate sense of natural justice is outraged by the slow
realisation that his mother has effectively raped him: the mother
spends months deriving sexual pleasure from pawing and ogling every
part of her baby’s body and from using her baby as a human sex toy or
vibrator to stimulate the mother’s nipples, which - according to the
women I have known - unavoidably leads to sexual arousal and
engorgement of the mother’s clitoris. (The exception to this is when
the mother has been so badly repressed by her own upbringing - read
downbringing - that her body refuses to respond to nipple stimulation
as Nature intended.) The infant’s love for the mother is boundless and
intensely focused. To refuse the infant the opportunity to return the
mother’s delightfully pleasurable caresses, exactly as given, to
refuse the infant any physical outlet for such an intense emotion of
boundless love - is a hideously cruel regime of systematic child abuse
practised by every mother in our sick and tragic civilisation for the
past eleven thousand years. If you are a mother in the present
civilisation, you are - by definition - a child abuser, because the
immediate unconscious goal of motherhood is to generate soldiers, and
only child abuse can generate soldiers. This is going on because of
the present regime of insanity which was imposed on us in the chaos of
an ancient survivalist emergency, and never changed after the
vegetation grew back.
----------------------------------
And that is why you don’t remember your infancy. There is no
biological explanation for this near-universal amnesia. The
explanation is psychological. Amnesia occurs when an experience is so
terrifying and so traumatising that the human mind cannot bear the
pain of allowing it into consciousness. Such is the mother-infant
relationship. What every mother has been doing to every infant for the
past eleven thousand years - to turn infants into soldier material -
is so TERRIFYING and so traumatising for all of us that we had to take
refuge in amnesia. And so nearly all of you don’t remember your
infancy.
In common with only a small number of other people, I do remember my
infancy, in terms of recalling / recovering precisely and vividly the
authentic emotional states of the Universal Infant - the terror, the
trauma and the feelings of rejection and heartbreak experienced by all
of us as it dawned on us that our mothers are half-insane and are
tormenting us and rejecting us in order to present yet another litter
of hate-crazed, amnesiac soldiers to the warmongering male ruling
elite.
///end of extracts from "Silence of the Damned"///
========================================================
http://docs.google.com/View?docid=dddp6bt4_829zpt8ffd
.
- References:
- Children as young as 12 seeking sex on the Internet
- From: Webmanager_CritEst
- Re: Children as young as 12 seeking sex on the Internet
- From: Webmanager_CritEst
- Re: Children as young as 12 seeking sex on the Internet
- From: Ishtar
- Re: Children as young as 12 seeking sex on the Internet
- From: Ishtar
- Re: Children as young as 12 seeking sex on the Internet
- From: Captain Squashy Feet
- Re: Children as young as 12 seeking sex on the Internet
- From: Ishtar
- Re: Children as young as 12 seeking sex on the Internet
- From: Captain Squashy Feet
- Children as young as 12 seeking sex on the Internet
- Prev by Date: Re: Another Slap In The Face For Schools
- Next by Date: Re: Another Slap In The Face For Schools
- Previous by thread: Re: Children as young as 12 seeking sex on the Internet
- Next by thread: Re: Children as young as 12 seeking sex on the Internet
- Index(es):