Re: Man sues M&S for £300K over grape
- From: Alex Heney <me8@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 21:40:54 +0000
On Fri, 14 Mar 2008 14:07:38 -0000, "Colonel Colt"
<NoneOfYourBusiness@feckoff,org> wrote:
"Alex Heney" <me8@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:i8lgt39j49uon6rt4kn47vpoaoviki2pov@xxxxxxxxxx
I really wish personal injury claims could be discussed without the moral
And (Rightly IMO), he lost.
As did the gambler in the case where he was suing the bookie for
letting him continue gambling.
(The only similarity being that both were trying to get somebody else
to pay for their own problems, and both failed today)
indignation that someone should dare to hold another to account for
negligence. He lost because the judge didn't believe that there was
sufficient evidence to establish that the grape was responsible for his
slipping. If there has been evidence that his slipping was down to the
negligence of M&S then he would have been completely right to expect M&S 'to
pay for [his] own probelms'.
No he wouldn't.
He would then have been completely right to expect M&S to pay for the
problems they had caused. Not "his own problems".
Incidentally, I must have missed the "moral indignation that someone
should dare to hold another to account for negligence" bit in this
thread. Could you point out the post(s) where you feel that happened?
there was certainly and absolutely no such inference in the post you
responded to.
--
Alex Heney, Global Villager
Reformat Hard Drive! Are you SURE (Y/Y)?
To reply by email, my address is alexATheneyDOTplusDOTcom
.
- References:
- Man sues M&S for £300K over grape
- From: Webmanager_CritEst
- Re: Man sues M&S for £300K over grape
- From: Alex Heney
- Re: Man sues M&S for £300K over grape
- From: Colonel Colt
- Man sues M&S for £300K over grape
- Prev by Date: Re: tv license
- Next by Date: Re: tv license
- Previous by thread: Re: Man sues M&S for £300K over grape
- Next by thread: Solicitor versus bank for will writing services?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
