Re: Further to BT's con trick on fees
- From: Nick <Nick.Spam@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2008 19:52:13 +0000
tim (not at home) wrote:
"Nick" <Nick.Spam@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:63sqa1F2881bqU1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxBlah wrote:Nick wrote:And go where?Blah wrote:Exactly. If people don't like it, vote with their feet rather than moan.MM wrote:No. I would be happier if customers were encouraged to look at their bills and actively consider the service they were getting, rather than listen to dishonest justifications of DD.
Why is it BT's fault that none of the competition compete on this issue?
It is not BT's "fault", they act in their own interests.
I believe the situation requires government regulation to protect consumer interests.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- Further to BT's con trick on fees
- From: MM
- Re: Further to BT's con trick on fees
- From: Blah
- Re: Further to BT's con trick on fees
- From: Nick
- Re: Further to BT's con trick on fees
- From: Blah
- Re: Further to BT's con trick on fees
- From: Nick
- Re: Further to BT's con trick on fees
- From: tim \(not at home\)
- Further to BT's con trick on fees
- Prev by Date: Re: Returns policy
- Next by Date: Re: Paramedic threatens to sue patient
- Previous by thread: Re: Further to BT's con trick on fees
- Next by thread: Re: Further to BT's con trick on fees
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|