Re: I note that no one is mentioning Jim Bates this morning!

lisabartal@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote in
news:6dc6ba3f-e15b-4957-b83c-f3ea7a1b88d1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx:

On Mar 10, 7:24 pm, Periander <4rubb...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
lisabar...@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote
innews:1dcc9972-9803-4be7-8d38-85908bbbbeb6@v
3g2000hsc.googlegroups.com:

...



and can you back that up please?- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

yeah, it is called my husband.

Who there bald Eagle, Paleface speaks with forked tongue, back on the
19th


of Feb you wrote:

"We were able to prove the landslide info was credit card
fraud.  So what do we do? "

Which (if any) version is the truth, a few weeks ago he was an
innocent unconvicted man who'd been arrested on the basis of credit
card fraud and this week he's a convicted sex offender?

If you're going to tell stories you've got to have a good memory,
failing that do what some of the others do, put in the relevant
header to prevent your posts being archived.

--

Regards or otherwise,

Periander

Where am I contradicting myself?

By firstly claiming that hubby was a "victim" of credit card fraud and
then admitting he's been convicted of making images of child sexual
abuse?

You see, if fraud, then not guilty. It's not all that difficult to
follow surely?

And then you pap on about hash values being the same as file names and
that it's possible to be convicted on the basis of hash values alone.
Wel simply put, that is a lie, whether it's a lie of your own making or
it's a lie that you're repeating is of little consequnce but it is a lie
all the same.

So we have your husband "innocent" because of credit card fraud
Then we have your husband convicted of having particular hash values
found on the HD of his computer ...
.... and later on along this stub you say he had thumbnail images of
child sex abuse.

Those statements cannot all be true, it's a logical impossibility so I
suppose we have to decide if ...

(a1) You really have a husband who's been convicted of downloading
images of child sex abuse and you're simply repeating the excuses he
gave you and you're to dumb to challenge him.
(a2) You really have a husband who's been convicted of downloading
images of child sex abuse and you're simply repeating the excuses he
gave you and you're to frightened of the consequences to face up to the
facts.
(a3) You really have a husband who's been convicted of downloading
images of child sex abuse and you're simply repeating the excuses he
gave you and you're incapable of facing up to your husband's behaviour
and are thus repeating his lies for the purpioses of your own
validation.
(b) Even more of your story is made up and you are in fact the offender
yourself posing as this poor distrught woman in order to elicit a little
sympathy for the excuses you used yourself in court and thus gain a
little personal validation.
(c) You're simply a troll

Whatever it is there's very little hope, if you're incapable of being
honest there's little point in debate.

--
Regards or otherwise,

Periander
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: John Lennon planned to reunite the Beatles
    ... I'm merely pointing out ... have brazenly and systematically distorted the nature of what he ... "If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, ...
    (rec.music.beatles)
  • Re: John Lennon planned to reunite the Beatles
    ... I'm merely pointing out ... have brazenly and systematically distorted the nature of what he ... "If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, ...
    (rec.music.beatles)
  • Re: Our mutual border
    ... Barbara Napilano repeated the lie just last month. ... They did not sneak into the US from Canada. ... She also said that she regrets that Canada can't seem to get past her "one misstatement". ... Then there is the attitude that, after a person in a position to know better gets caught repeating that same old misstatement/misinformation lie, she gets all indignant and says that we just get past it. ...
    (rec.food.cooking)
  • Re: Where in the world is Anthea Kerrison
    ... Yeah yeah yeah. ... Thanks for admitting that YOU have repeated the same lie for ten ... random people think you are a pathological liar ...
    (rec.skiing.alpine)
  • Re: Theres No Arguing With Conservatives ... No, Seriously
    ... And you will repeat the lie over and over ... people they deemed "conservatives" by undefined means were ... how strongly liberals would cling to liberal lies after seeing ... And she keeps repeating the lie over ...
    (rec.martial-arts)
Loading