Re: Limitations on expense claim payments
- From: Caecilius <nosuch@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 08 Jan 2008 15:17:56 GMT
On Tue, 08 Jan 2008 11:21:25 GMT, Palindrome <me9@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
If the company placed a contract with another company which required
that company to purchase services - then I don't think that the original
company could refuse to pay if the second company didn't invoice them
until a few months later. A contract is a contract and a debt arising
from a contract can't be refused payment simply because of a delay in
invoicing..
This goes to the heart of the matter.
If an employee has incurred legitimate expenses, then the company is
oblighed to reimburse these. The question is whether it is legal to limit
the time in which claims for reimburesement can be made.
I know that many companies do it, but is it legal? Is it not, at the end
of the day, a debt that the company owes to the individual and must pay?
I want to put in a limit if possible because I think it would help the
administration, but there's not much point if it cannot be enforced.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Limitations on expense claim payments
- From: Peter Crosland
- Re: Limitations on expense claim payments
- From: Palindrome
- Re: Limitations on expense claim payments
- References:
- Limitations on expense claim payments
- From: Caecilius
- Re: Limitations on expense claim payments
- From: David
- Re: Limitations on expense claim payments
- From: Palindrome
- Limitations on expense claim payments
- Prev by Date: Re: Limitations on expense claim payments
- Next by Date: Re: Clarkson stung after bank prank
- Previous by thread: Re: Limitations on expense claim payments
- Next by thread: Re: Limitations on expense claim payments
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|