Re: WTF? A new tax?
- From: "steve robinson" <steve@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 02 Jan 2008 17:06:46 GMT
whitely525@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
On 2 Jan, 08:09, "Display name:" <nokia.acco...@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:Many tradesmen have said this for years however thier is a cost and
Mogga wrote:
On Tue, 01 Jan 2008 00:58:19 +0000, Jonathan Bryce
<jonat...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Gaz wrote:
'Affordable housing' = Labour voters.
Shirley Porter got surcharged for signficantly less.
A lot of the "Affordable" housing is for people earning > £30k.
While people with that sort of level of income can't generally
afford a house, they are not what you would generally think of as
low paid workers.
Affordable housing is nulabour spin.
Flats near me had to have 10% affordable housing. That meant they
had to sell them at a discount. So 85k rather than 120k. Yes it
is a discount, but the average wage in Oldham is 22k according to
a recent newspaper article so even a 3X mortgage is out of reach
for the affordable flat (Ignoring the £90 a month service charge
the developer reaps too)
Before you say 5X mortgage makes them affordable, I'll just point
out the teeny tiny mortgage problems going on relating to a
credit crunch caused by lenders ledning silly amounts of money.
One solution is to make property only for owner occupier or
renting at the market rent. This would take the incentive for
investing in the property market away and bring house prices back
to a sensible level.
I think you need to stop smoking that sh*t, because the ENTIRE
reason for the house-price boom of the last 15 years is the
increase in the number of buy-to-let investors - who by
substantially increasing demand, have forced prices to the absurd
levels we currently see.
It is lack of supply. Planning restrictions are choking the supply.
BTL is only a small portion of the market. In many cases BTL
investors are helping to renovate housing stock.
These types of houses are often bought at auction rather than
competing directly with FTBs
In any case BTL has apparently evaporated.
The collapse of confidence in private pensions schemes coupled with
Brown's plundering of them, has meant that investors get better
returns on safer investments in the housing market.
The only way out of the crisis is tax penalties on buy-to-let
investors to fund tax incentives to house-builders.
A nice proviso would be that said incentives be contigent on the
build quality of new houses, so we don't end up a nation living in
cardboard rabbit hutches.
They need to be built to a good standard period. Bringing developers
up to the standards of council housing would be a start.
the buying public dont want to pick up the tab
--
.
- References:
- WTF? A new tax?
- From: Mike Ross
- Re: WTF? A new tax?
- From: Gaz
- Re: WTF? A new tax?
- From: Jonathan Bryce
- Re: WTF? A new tax?
- From: Mogga
- Re: WTF? A new tax?
- From: Display name:
- Re: WTF? A new tax?
- From: whitely525
- WTF? A new tax?
- Prev by Date: Re: Using a mobile phone while cycling
- Next by Date: Re: Price of diesel/petrol
- Previous by thread: Re: WTF? A new tax?
- Next by thread: Re: WTF? A new tax?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading